We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Want to buy a house but keep existing property and rent it out, need advice please.
Comments
-
cooliegirl wrote: »Thanks. How did it work for you timing wise? i don't think we could do that, we will need to find a new house, then spend some time making sure that our old house is in tip top rental condition. The income from rent may be a few months later.
Sorry for not getting back earlier...
We got the Let to Buy mortgage first. We had an idea of the price ceiling we were prepared to go to for buying the new house and the amount of equity we'd need to release. Getting the LTB in place before we found somewhere gave us more flexibility and meant the deposit money was sat there waiting. You can still live in the house with a LTB mortgage in place.
It was about a 3 month gap between getting the LTB and completing on the new house.0 -
It's very tax-efficient to keep the majority of equity in your own home (your primary residence) because it's not subject to capital gains tax as your rental flat would be. Interest payments on the let property can be offset against rental income, so it's tempting to keep the borrowing to the highest level your lender will allow. However, if you have an interest-only mortgage for your rental property, you will still have to re-pay the capital sum at the end of the mortgage term, so will need another investment which can clear the capital sum.
There are several models of property investment - some people are interested only in income yield, whilst others are content to break even on operating costs and are interested only in capital growth. Some people buy shares in property funds but never actually own property themselves.
The usual financial advice for amateur investors is to have 1/3 of your money in property, 1/3 in shares and pension, 1/3 in cash or cash equivalents. For most people, the primary residence is going to represent a lot more than 1/3 of their net asset wealth, and would therefore leave them over-exposed to one investment category. It's up to you to decide whether you're prepared to take that investment risk. Successful landlords are professional investors in the property sector - it's just that the recent (and atypical) increases in property prices have misled amateurs into thinking anyone can enjoy the same success. I wonder how many of us would contemplate becoming day-traders with the same alacrity?0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.7K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454K Spending & Discounts
- 244.6K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.3K Life & Family
- 258.3K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards