We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Help!! New house with bad credit history

2»

Comments

  • chris_m
    chris_m Posts: 8,250 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Yorkie1 wrote: »
    No it is not. It is only against the law to open mail, intending to use it to the addressee's detriment.

    Couldn't shopping them to their creditors be viewed as "to their detriment" ?

    :rotfl::rotfl::rotfl:
  • G_M
    G_M Posts: 51,977 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    paddedjohn wrote: »
    If you get post not addressed to you, you should write on the envelope nkata and pop it in the post box. It is against the law to open mail not addressed to you
    Rubbish. It is against the law to interfere with the delivery of mail. Once it is delivered (to the address on the envelope) it is no longer subject to the same law.
  • G_M
    G_M Posts: 51,977 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    kelk wrote: »
    ok thanks for the feedback, but surely there is a better way other thann send letters back and phoning companies to stop these letters being sent here

    Like....?
    You could trying praying to a non-existant being for him / her to intevene on your behalf??

    Just stop getting wound up by something that does not concern you.

    So some post arrives. Return it. What's the problem?
  • paddedjohn
    paddedjohn Posts: 7,512 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture
    Section 84: Interfering with the mail: general

    </B>127. Section 84(1) provides for it to be an offence if persons intentionally delay or open postal packets without reasonable excuse. It amalgamates the content of offences previously included in the Post Office Act 1953.
    Be Alert..........Britain needs lerts.
  • paddedjohn
    paddedjohn Posts: 7,512 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture
    g_m wrote: »
    rubbish. It is against the law to interfere with the delivery of mail. Once it is delivered (to the address on the envelope) it is no longer subject to the same law.
    the mail belongs to the person not the address.
    Be Alert..........Britain needs lerts.
  • DVardysShadow
    DVardysShadow Posts: 18,949 Forumite
    paddedjohn wrote: »
    Section 84: Interfering with the mail: general

    </B>127. Section 84(1) provides for it to be an offence if persons intentionally delay or open postal packets without reasonable excuse. It amalgamates the content of offences previously included in the Post Office Act 1953.
    That is a summary of the law, not the law itself. This question has been dealt with here many times before. The Act itself makes it clear that there is 1 offence relating to mail in transit - it is absolutely illegal to interfere with this - and another offence relating to opening mail addressed to someone else, which is only illegal if it is intended to act to the addressee's detriment.

    Many people come here and trip up on that distinction.
    Hi, we’ve had to remove your signature. If you’re not sure why please read the forum rules or email the forum team if you’re still unsure - MSE ForumTeam
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.4K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 604.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.4K Life & Family
  • 261.6K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.