We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Any benefits for if there is a part share in a holiday home

About three years ago I bought a holiday home in France to rent out. The house was put into the names of my two daughters for IHT purposes. One of my daughters is separating from her partner. Her current family home is in joint names and it is possible that she may be entitled to some equity in it but probably not enough to buy a house. She has three children (5, 7 & 10) and is training to become a teaching assistant. The earliest she is likely to be employed is May 2011 and part time at that.
My question:
Is she eligible for any benefits in view of the fact that she will have a pre tax rental income of about £2500 pa from the holiday home and possible equity of £100k that may take some months to materialise?
«13

Comments

  • Oldernotwiser
    Oldernotwiser Posts: 37,425 Forumite
    My question:
    Is she eligible for any benefits in view of the fact that she will have a pre tax rental income of about £2500 pa from the holiday home and possible equity of £100k that may take some months to materialise?

    One would certainly hope not!
  • Vader123
    Vader123 Posts: 1,104 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Is she eligible for any benefits in view of the fact that she will have a pre tax rental income of about £2500 pa from the holiday home and possible equity of £100k that may take some months to materialise?

    £100k of equity removes her from means tested benefits.

    So.

    No.

    Vader
  • McKneff
    McKneff Posts: 38,857 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Things like this have a way of coming back and biting you in the bum, consider yourself bittin.
    make the most of it, we are only here for the weekend.
    and we will never, ever return.
  • zagfles
    zagfles Posts: 21,686 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Chutzpah Haggler
    edited 12 November 2010 at 9:58PM
    She'll be entitled to child tax credit. She might be getting some now, but if her partner was the main earner, it could increase substantially.

    There are no capital rules in tax credits, she'll need to declare the income from the holiday home and it may reduce what she gets a bit, but if her income remains below about £16k or so she'll get CTC at the full rate (about £7500pa with 3 kids). Any maintenance her ex pays, bizarrely, does not reduce tax credits.
  • Thanks for your help. Her soon to be ex is the main (only) earner and works away from home Mon - Fri. It's only now that the last child has gone to school that she is able to seek work. £100k will not buy a house and no employment record for the last 7 years means no possibility of a mortgage in the present climate. I guess that she needs to use any equity in the present family home to rent a house.
  • dmg24
    dmg24 Posts: 33,920 Forumite
    10,000 Posts
    Which part of the country are you in? Has she looked at shared ownership?
    Gone ... or have I?
  • Oldernotwiser
    Oldernotwiser Posts: 37,425 Forumite
    edited 13 November 2010 at 2:59PM
    Thanks for your help. Her soon to be ex is the main (only) earner and works away from home Mon - Fri. It's only now that the last child has gone to school that she is able to seek work. £100k will not buy a house and no employment record for the last 7 years means no possibility of a mortgage in the present climate. I guess that she needs to use any equity in the present family home to rent a house.

    I've just realised that I've been misreading the post and that the £100,000 is the likely equity from the sale of the marital home, not from the sale of the French property!

    Surely if she has £100,000 and the money from the French property, this is likely to give her enough to buy somewhere?
  • zagfles
    zagfles Posts: 21,686 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Chutzpah Haggler
    I've just realised that I've been misreading the post and that the £100,000 is the likely equity from the sale of the marital home, not from the sale of the French property!

    Surely if she has £100,000 and the money from the French property, this is likely to give her enough to buy somewhere?

    Alternatively, could she stay in her current house and buy her partner's equity out with her share of the French property? Obviously this all depends on the amount of equity in both and how they split things, but given he works away does he really want the house?

    This could be a good deal for both - she'd have the current house and all the equity, and the big advantage that property which you live in does not count as capital for the purposes of benefits, so assuming no other savings she should be able to get income support or income based JSA, plus mortgage interest support, plus counil tax benefit, as well as tax credits. And he'd get an income producing asset rather than what normally happens, a equity share in a house he doesn't live in and produces no income.
  • skintbint_2
    skintbint_2 Posts: 1,822 Forumite
    remember the property in France is an asset in her name and will be taken into account as such, as well as the income which would probably impact on the Income Support or income Based JSA, also you state she is training does she recieve funding, grants etc?
    skintbint x
    here's tae us, wha's like us - fell few and and they're a deid"
    10k in 2010/£6988.30-69.88%@29/12/10, 11k in 2011/£897 07.04.11- fell by the wayside!!!
    12k in 2012 - £204.00 @ 4/1/12

    do not confuse me with the other skintbint who joined dec2011 - i am the original bint:rotfl:
  • zaksmum
    zaksmum Posts: 5,529 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    The marital home has not yet been sold so there would be no requirement to declare the POSSIBLE 100K equity to the authorities until/unless she actually receives it.

    The £2500 pre tax rental amount would have to be declared but would not be too much to stop her claiming certain benefits.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 604K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.4K Life & Family
  • 261.5K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.