We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

csa going for liability order

13»

Comments

  • just replied lol.they are such a waste of space!
  • CSA_Help
    CSA_Help Posts: 1,318 Forumite
    If they are going to court for an LO take your evidence show the judge and the chances are they will be told to get their house in order before going back to the court. Show him the conflicting info.

    Thsi will give you time
  • CSA_Help
    CSA_Help Posts: 1,318 Forumite
    Kezzy what you need is a complet breakdown of the debt preferabaly the majority before 2000. :)
  • it is all pre-2000.arrears have been collected since he started paying by deo in 2001
  • so for 9 years he has been paying this £2000 odd back
  • The Lo will be served in any case. Courts succumb to the the CSA and always side with them. Get you data protection details and try to delay it.

    Liabilities orders are not what they are cracked up to be, just legalises the debt
  • Hi Kezzygirl,

    I think I posted on your other thread about the 'overpayment'. Remember that if a DEO has been taken out for the correct ammount, then your other half has met his requirement to pay maintenance. if the CSA make a mess of how it is split up, then it is their maladministration that has caused the problem. If the assessment is correct, the DEO deducted and the maintenance paid by his employer to the CSA then he is not in arrears. The CSA need to admit liability on this one as if the maintenance was to be split a certain way and they have paid it all to one PWC, then they have made the error and overpaid one PWC, and underpaid the other. Best of luck,

    Dizzy
  • thanks for that dizzy.i put an update thread on here monday.we have handed the case over to nacsa....letting them deal with it!they think we have a very good case so fingers crossed!
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 603.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.3K Life & Family
  • 261.2K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.