We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
small damage to door - astronomical deduction from deposit. Please help!
Comments
-
thanks that sounds like a decent idea!!
Could i definitely do that??? (Charge them for me using a solicitor i mean?)0 -
i would tell them that the court issued an order which the solicitors are refusing to implemt and that you plan to ask the court if this behaviour is Contempt OF Court - a solicitor would NOT want to risk his reputation in court in that way.,.... he would probably be struck off if he were found guilty
They are buliyng you
On the original court order... it will have given a date by which the money should be paid... what is that date ? IF the date is past.. then their client is in contempt of court already......
I think this is likely to get you your money MUCH faster0 -
Sambucus_Nigra wrote: »S/He has gone a year without it - why not be as beligerent right back at them and take the risk?
It depends what the most practical course is. Not everything has to be a matter of proving your manhood.No reliance should be placed on the above! Absolutely none, do you hear?0 -
I'm styruggling to have sympathy here.
Yes a LL has obligations and should be following the law but..
October 2009 was two months since you gave the LL deposit. You moved out in November, presumably the Landlord allowed this. You have admitted to the LL in email that you have damaged the door. You have been given CCJ for 3x the deposit.
Bearing in mind that the LL could have played hardball and held you to that contract do feel you are being a little stubborn to not pay for damage you admit you have caused.
Both LL and T have obligations.0 -
Already been said but to reiterate, sounds like you have the LL over a barrel. Stand up for the little man and get paid the full amount you are due. You should look out for yourself not worry about other people...0
-
I'm more than happy to pay for the door, but I don't believe it's even been replaced - I've asked for photo evidence and receipts and none have come forward.
I will push for the full amount and as I've suggested to them, if they approach me down th line with proof etc I will pay a reasonable amount
Thanks all - will keep you updated0 -
If its being sold as the LL is bankrupt how do you know there is enough equity for you to get your cash?
Assuming it has a mortgage once the mortgagee reposesses the property they will get first dibs on any equity for the amount owed, plus arrears plus costs for reposession
Sounds like you need to think about this - the £200 you are holding out for could be the difference between the LL being able to sell and repossession. Do you want to risk this?0 -
I've spoken to the trustee and they have assured me there is plenty of equity there0
-
See the colour of their money first. If I'd been awarded 3 time the deposit as penalty I'd have no problem paying the LL the £200-odd quid for the door whether it had actually been replaced or not but I'd want to see their cash first.0
-
thanks that sounds like a decent idea!!
Could i definitely do that??? (Charge them for me using a solicitor i mean?)
1. If you haven't done so now make sure all your contact with the solicitor is in writing only. Preferably by letter but you can use email and post a first class letter to them with exactly the same content as the email to speed things up.
2. State in the email/letter that all replies are to be in writing.
3. And yes you can threaten to charge them for use of a solicitor and your additional costs.
However I would:
1. If the LL has a trustee and is bankrupt I would also cc copies of the letter to them with a covering letter stating that you may pay a reasonable amount towards the currently alleged damage, after you have been repaid in full as per your charging order and are provided with proof of any damage.
2. Threaten to report the solicitor to their professional body for misconduct if they contact you in any way apart from in writing.I'm not cynical I'm realistic
(If a link I give opens pop ups I won't know I don't use windows)0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.5K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.4K Spending & Discounts
- 247.4K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.5K Life & Family
- 261.7K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
