We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum. This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are - or become - political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
MSE News: Post office bank plan rejected
Former_MSE_Dan
Posts: 1,593 Forumite
This is the discussion thread for the following MSE News Story:
Read the full story:
Post office bank plan rejected
Post office bank plan rejected
Former MSE team member
0
Comments
-
What would be the rationale behind a post office bank? There are plenty of banks already - several that let you service them at the post office.
If it is simply just to prop up the post office, you might as well just give them the cash.0 -
The state already supports banks both directly and indirectly - I'm not sure why we need another one especially one where you need to queue for half an hour behind someone with their ebay parcels.0
-
The state already supports banks both directly and indirectly - I'm not sure why we need another one especially one where you need to queue for half an hour behind someone with their ebay parcels.
I'm the other way round - I don't see why I should have to queue for half an hour to post a parcel behind old biddies and people on benefits getting £20 out when they could get an account with any major bank and use a cashpoint. Especially given that Post Offices are, well, for post.
Same as PayPoint in shops, always end up stuck with a heavy basket behind some silly sod wanting to pay all their bills!urs sinserly,
~~joosy jeezus~~0 -
JuicyJesus wrote: »I'm the other way round - I don't see why I should have to queue for half an hour to post a parcel behind old biddies and people on benefits getting £20 out when they could get an account with any major bank and use a cashpoint. Especially given that Post Offices are, well, for post.
Same as PayPoint in shops, always end up stuck with a heavy basket behind some silly sod wanting to pay all their bills!
My sympathy is for the poor 'old biddies' who have gone through years of austerity bringing up their families, having to listen to some obnoxious fool chuntering impatiently behind them because he thinks he is better than them purely by dint of having been born in a more prosperous era.0 -
My sympathy is for the poor 'old biddies' who have gone through years of austerity bringing up their families, having to listen to some obnoxious fool chuntering impatiently behind them because he thinks he is better than them purely by dint of having been born in a more prosperous era.
That's not fair to equate prosperity to being an obnoxious tit. I'm sure every generation has these genetic dead ends.Santander are awful - mission in life is to warn people since 17-Sep-10, 18-Sep-10 realised one of thousands.0 -
Whatever happened to Giro, the Peoples Bank. Run by the Post Office, then sold to Alliance and Leicester.0
-
Why spend public money on investing in a post office bank only for some future government to sell it to santander for a quick profit?0
-
My sympathy is for the poor 'old biddies' who have gone through years of austerity bringing up their families, having to listen to some obnoxious fool chuntering impatiently behind them because he thinks he is better than them purely by dint of having been born in a more prosperous era.
I fail to see how that in any way counters my point that Post Offices should be primarily for the sending and receiving of mail, not financial transactions. All allowing banking to be done there does is complicate things and waste time for people who want to use the Post Office for its intended purpose.urs sinserly,
~~joosy jeezus~~0 -
JuicyJesus wrote: »I fail to see how that in any way counters my point that Post Offices should be primarily for the sending and receiving of mail, not financial transactions. All allowing banking to be done there does is complicate things and waste time for people who want to use the Post Office for its intended purpose.
I agree. I was on my lunchbreak a few months ago went into the post office to post a parcel - queued for half an hour behind 12 people and 8 or 9 of them were old farts getting £20 in cash out.
what a waste of resources.0 -
JuicyJesus wrote: »I fail to see how that in any way counters my point that Post Offices should be primarily for the sending and receiving of mail, not financial transactions.
It's mainly because of the pension that there are so many post offices. If they were only for sending parcels there would never have been anything like as many."It will take, five, 10, 15 years to get back to where we need to be. But it's no longer the individual banks that are in the wrong, it's the banking industry as a whole." - Steven Cooper, head of personal and business banking at Barclays, talking to Martin Lewis0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 346.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 251.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 451.1K Spending & Discounts
- 238.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 613.3K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 174.5K Life & Family
- 251.4K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards