We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
non-working households
Comments
-
lemonjelly wrote: »2 things on this point.
Firstly, though they are in a minority, there are working lone parents, & there is support within the system to facilitate this.
Secondly, there are many household "claiming" to be lone parent households, which are not in reality.
In example, working in a college, it is amazing how many students live with their mom only, & the mom claims lone parent benefits. Astoundingly the sheer number of times I telephone & their just visiting father happens to answer the phone!
I also see, especially at enrolment, a lot of people come in with (people I assume to be their) partners, yet apply for the course as a lone parent.
But you must admit, Single parents, Early retried (forced or not) and disabled will make up a lot of the data.
The first thing I think of on these releases are 2 parents and 2.3 children not working. that is simply not the case.
Looking past that you can see how much of the data is eaten up for reasons that would not change, recession or not.0 -
Just to add, 1 in 5 households with a person aged 16-64 in is still well worth a lot more investigation imo, to establish a breakdown of the types of households making up this 19% of the nation...It's getting harder & harder to keep the government in the manner to which they have become accustomed.0
-
lemonjelly wrote: »Just to add, 1 in 5 households with a person aged 16-64 in is still well worth a lot more investigation imo, to establish a breakdown of the types of households making up this 19% of the nation...
I've done my bit.
just a bit more
http://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&q=cache:zc3MSeYGAboJ:campaigns.dwp.gov.uk/asd/asd5/rrep002.pdf+number+of+disabled+households&hl=en&gl=uk&pid=bl&srcid=ADGEESi-44JvglYfI1RTmuZ3rwETyJReisZY4fcxrU_GbhNEmDiUrKy3g_qn0RtRHHBZ8U5r2UbuA5bhlnG3vL_UT4ATSVc3VEgk_vyKqtd1UI8JnuXvf3LkUTw0GBtyvjj4eTV-yiGG&sig=AHIEtbTX5Kbfo13m0eCK9MQ6kPpa7qQwgQ
Table 3.4
32% of households with some one disabled do not have a earner in the household.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.2K Spending & Discounts
- 245.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.4K Life & Family
- 258.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards