We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Pregnant and new job

123457»

Comments

  • Savvy_Sue
    Savvy_Sue Posts: 47,477 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    FBaby wrote: »
    Just one thing to consider, rather than telling them that you intend on working until a week before your due date and coming back two weeks later, I would suggest you test the waters and see how they would react with a 6 weeks maternity leave. That is still a very short time and would give you a little bit more time with your baby. No offense at all, but I think giving birth and looking after a newborn does come as a shock and might not be what you expect at all. To start with, you seem to already think that you will be able to breastfeed and -therefore I assume - express milk for whoever is looking after the baby to give it in a bottle, but many newborn breastfeeding absolutely refuse to take on a bottle, not very pleasant compared to the warmth and softness of a breast! The last thing you want to is to feel under massive pressure to come back when you and your baby just physically can't.
    That sounds like very good advice ...

    BTW, poorgrad, have you looked into whether you are entitled to Maternity Allowance? If you are a recent graduate, I'd guess not, as you won't have paid enough NI in the relevant years, unless you were working a LOT of hours on the side. But if you ARE entitled to MA, it will probably pay more than your wages for any period you claim it, if you're only working a couple of hours a week.

    From the point of view of staying on good terms with your employer, you might still want to hurry back. From an economic point of view, perhaps not so much.
    Signature removed for peace of mind
  • silvercar
    silvercar Posts: 49,936 Ambassador
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Academoney Grad Name Dropper
    If it was really a non-issue and as immaterial as saying you had a holiday already booked a few months hence, what is the problem in declaring it at the outset.

    The only reason not to declare it is that you know that it won't be as simple as 2 weeks off and then back to work as before.
    I'm a Forum Ambassador on the housing, mortgages & student money saving boards. I volunteer to help get your forum questions answered and keep the forum running smoothly. Forum Ambassadors are not moderators and don't read every post. If you spot an illegal or inappropriate post then please report it to forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com (it's not part of my role to deal with this). Any views are mine and not the official line of MoneySavingExpert.com.
  • Oldernotwiser
    Oldernotwiser Posts: 37,425 Forumite
    Person_one wrote: »
    Seriously? You think someone should be unemployable because of a planned surgery?

    I think it would be very wrong for someone to accept a job when they know that they're going to be off almost immediately for some time for surgery. I think that they should be honest with their employer and, if that means they lose the job, then so be it.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 258.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.