We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
AAA 'Good To Go' rechargeable battery test.
Options

dragonfruit
Posts: 167 Forumite


I have tested 8 Good To Go AAA batteries using analyzer, which follows the IEC standard for determining battery capacity.
These are the test results:
1 "Good To Go" 660 mAh
2 "Good To Go" 665 mAh
3 "Good To Go" 673 mAh
4 "Good To Go" 658 mAh
5 "Good To Go" 660 mAh
6 "Good To Go" 648 mAh
7 "Good To Go" 659 mAh
8 "Good To Go" 647 mAh
So, they have 16-19 % less capacity than advertised 800 mAh.
Mind though, that also other brands usually have less capacity than their 'face value', but usually the difference is not more than 5-7%.
Only the green BTY batteries, supposedly 2500 mAh, purchased on eBay, did not follow that rule, as they really had only 201 mAh and 191 mAh capacity, i.e. 92% less capacity than their 'face value'.
Weight:
AAA "Good To Go" 11g
AA BTY 2500 21g, the other one 22 g
AA Sanyo Eneloop 2000 mAh 26 g
AA Sony 2700 mAh 30 g
AA Panasonic Ni-Cd 800 mAh, 20g, another on 21 g
AAA Kendal alkaline 12 g
AAA Hengwei non-alkaline dry cell Super heavy duty 8g
AA Duracel alkaline 24 g
AA Sony alkaline 23 g
AA Panasonic alkaline 23 g
These are the test results:
1 "Good To Go" 660 mAh
2 "Good To Go" 665 mAh
3 "Good To Go" 673 mAh
4 "Good To Go" 658 mAh
5 "Good To Go" 660 mAh
6 "Good To Go" 648 mAh
7 "Good To Go" 659 mAh
8 "Good To Go" 647 mAh
So, they have 16-19 % less capacity than advertised 800 mAh.
Mind though, that also other brands usually have less capacity than their 'face value', but usually the difference is not more than 5-7%.
Only the green BTY batteries, supposedly 2500 mAh, purchased on eBay, did not follow that rule, as they really had only 201 mAh and 191 mAh capacity, i.e. 92% less capacity than their 'face value'.
Weight:
AAA "Good To Go" 11g
AA BTY 2500 21g, the other one 22 g
AA Sanyo Eneloop 2000 mAh 26 g
AA Sony 2700 mAh 30 g
AA Panasonic Ni-Cd 800 mAh, 20g, another on 21 g
AAA Kendal alkaline 12 g
AAA Hengwei non-alkaline dry cell Super heavy duty 8g
AA Duracel alkaline 24 g
AA Sony alkaline 23 g
AA Panasonic alkaline 23 g
0
Comments
-
but you don't say which make the highest mAh (whatever that is) was? (Only that the lowest was off ebay). And what relevance is the weight?
Sorry I am a non techie and don't fully understand.
I think the gadget show did a battery test a while back and there were substantial differences but cant remember the results now.0 -
but you don't say which make the highest mAh (whatever that is) was? (Only that the lowest was off ebay). And what relevance is the weight?
Sorry I am a non techie and don't fully understand.
I think the gadget show did a battery test a while back and there were substantial differences but cant remember the results now.
This is supposed to be a test of only 8 AAA "Good to Go" batteries, not a comparison between brands.
Some people weigh batteries to find out how much air manufacturer put in them instead of 'good stuff'.I think weighing is very unreliable, as battery wrapping plays a significant role, but anyway for people who do not have battery analysers it might be a method for spotting such poor batteries as BTY, which are much lighter than other of similar declared capacity.
0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 350.7K Banking & Borrowing
- 253K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.4K Spending & Discounts
- 243.7K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.8K Life & Family
- 256.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards