We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Sub-sale, back-to-back transaction HSBC question

I've got a question regarding sub-sales/back-to-back transaction. Basically, a new property was built with some units sold off plan. I'm buying from someone who bought off-plan and who has exchanged but not completed. (They have paid a deposit but not the full amount.) As a result the transaction would be classified as a sub-sale and I understand that a number of mortgage lenders are not lending in those cases.

Does anyone know whether HSBC are lending in those cases?
Does anyone know whether this a matter of negotiation or whether there is a clear rule?

Many thanks

Comments

  • _Andy_
    _Andy_ Posts: 11,150 Forumite
    Have you rung HSBC and asked?
  • Rang HSBC and they can't say over the phone. It requires a branch appointment. Very strange as they could not say over the phone whether they categogorically do or do not offer mortgages under these circumstances....
  • _Andy_
    _Andy_ Posts: 11,150 Forumite
    Phone teams only deal with routine cases, hence fobbing it to the branch.
  • RichPyke
    RichPyke Posts: 126 Forumite
    You will need to speak with HSBC and get it all sorted. If they usually don't accept sub-sales with the exception of a few exemptions you will still need to have HSBC confirm it.

    Arrange an appointment in branch, if nothing else, the hour or so you may lose is a lot less hassle than you'll get if it get's close to exchange and this crops up delaying everything - trust me, I'm in a similar position with Halifax (and despite my case being an exemption, I am still waiting on Halifax confirming this to the solicitors).
    Rich
  • Rang them again and this time they seem to say it's ok as long as my LTV does not exceed 75% and I will use the property as my primary residence. Not sure I can rely on their information though...
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 603.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.4K Life & Family
  • 261.3K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.