We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
No Aircraft Carrier with Aircraft for 9 years

1984ReturnsForReal_2
Posts: 15,431 Forumite
Now tell me our Country is being run by competent people
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-11570593
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-11570593
Not Again
0
Comments
-
Competence and Governance do not go hand in hand.'In nature, there are neither rewards nor punishments - there are Consequences.'0
-
The construction of two new aircraft carriers, HMS Queen Elizabeth and HMS Prince of Wales, will go ahead, as it would cost more to cancel the projects than proceed with them
Who thought it was a good idea to buy another two ships when they were £165bn in debt this year already?0 -
I bet the Argentinian government is rubbing their hands with glee at this announcement.0
-
Blacklight wrote: »Who thought it was a good idea to buy another two ships when they were £165bn in debt this year already?
weren't they actually ordered in about 1732 or something though?0 -
Blacklight wrote: »Who thought it was a good idea to buy another two ships when they were £165bn in debt this year already?
It says why further inThis is a system account and does not represent a real person. To contact the Forum Team email forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com0 -
1984ReturnsForReal wrote: »Now tell me our Country is being run by competent people
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-11570593
We aren't at war. Not a conventional one anyway. And if we were then we would be 99% reliant on permission from the Americans to project military power overseas, which would only be given if they were themselves involved in the conflict, meaning our participation would be pointless anyway.
We could double our navy to 4 aircraft carriers and 50 ships and they'd just about serve as half a days cannon fodder if China and Taiwan kicked off.
The kind of conflict we are involved in is assymetric warfare occupying countries where the civilian populous is largely hostile. Therefore it makes more sense to spend the money on infantry, intelligence and flak jackets.
Having a navy is mostly a reputational statement these days, one that we cant afford due to being broke.0 -
this is the price you pay for having 13 years of labour rule. the army has no aircraft carrier's with aircraft, but shal and dal have a nice 42" plasma and all the stella they could want.
never forget - LABOUR DESTROYED THIS COUNTRY with their lunacy.
Labour - Lets build 40 new schools and give all the kids free meals and free everything. Isn't this good
Conservative - yes, theoretically it is very good, but there is no money to pay for it. so it can't be done
Labour - Look the nasty party doesn't want to help kids. they are nasty. booo hisssss etc
Conservative - no, we are not nasty, we are simply living in the real world and can only do what we can afford
Labour - we will just borrow. and borrow and borrow. and when we run out again, we will borrow more, afterall, it is just free money that never has to be repaid.
Conservative - no actually, it does need to be repaid, and will have huge consequences for years to come
Labour - whatever, talk to the hand. its free stuff for all. isn't that great!!!
Conservative - great, but not financially viable.
Labour - booo hissss nasty party, thatcher milk snatcher and so on forever and ever amen.0 -
I think it's better to have 2 large aircraft carriers than to waste billions renewing trident.0
-
ruggedtoast wrote: »We could double our navy to 4 aircraft carriers and 50 ships and they'd just about serve as half a days cannon fodder if China and Taiwan kicked off.
& if the Marshians attacked we would be !!!!!!ed without them thingy mejiggy laser proton atomisers.
What is the point of having peashooters?Not Again0 -
The_White_Horse wrote: »the army has no aircraft carrier's with aircraft
I don't think the army ever had an aircraft carrier with aircraft.Not Again0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 352K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.2K Spending & Discounts
- 245K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.4K Life & Family
- 258.8K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards