We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Accounts that beat inflation

In the Your Money section of Saturday's Telegraph 16/10/10 (p5) Emma Wall writes that "a basic-rate taxpayer would have to find a savings account paying 3.88% to stop cash being eroded by inflation. While there are 118 savings accounts that offer this, the story is worse for those taxed at the higher rate. People earning more than £43,876 need to earn 5.17% interest to beat inflation and have a choice of just 55 accounts."

I can only think of a few regular saving accounts that pay 5% and these are usually linked to current accounts. Any idea where this figure of 55 accounts comes from or are there lots of accounts out there no-one has told me about??
«1

Comments

  • The thing with regular savings accounts also is that they don't tend to accept lump sums, so they are great if you're just starting to save, but not if you have a lump to put somewhere. Difficult to find inflation beating accounts unless you're prepared to lock up for at least 3 years or more by the looks of things.
  • I couldn`t find any and much regret the passing of ns and i index linked certs. I have bought a considerable amount of gilts called NR40 as they pay .625% plus inflation linking. They are in the sipp as I wanted to safeguard some of my dh`s cash. Other than that it is all about risk/reward and also about tying up cash for a longish time without knowing future interest rates and inflation.
  • Biggles
    Biggles Posts: 8,209 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    lucky77 wrote: »
    In the Your Money section of Saturday's Telegraph 16/10/10 (p5) Emma Wall writes that "a basic-rate taxpayer would have to find a savings account paying 3.88% to stop cash being eroded by inflation.
    That doesn't seem right. With inflation running at 4.6%, surely a standard rate taxpayer would need interest of 5.75%?
  • I saw the 3.88% figure on the BBC web site a couple of weeks ago as well. Didn't try and work it out though.
  • Sceptic001
    Sceptic001 Posts: 1,111 Forumite
    The only account currently available that protects against inflation (RPI + 50%) is the National Counties Building Society index-linked bond, which is discussed here:
    https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/2780388

    Its main drawback is that you are locked in for a fixed five-year term.

    I presume the 3.88% figure is based on the CPI (consumer prices index) inflation rate rather than RPI (retail prices index).
  • Biggles wrote: »
    That doesn't seem right. With inflation running at 4.6%, surely a standard rate taxpayer would need interest of 5.75%?

    You are quoting RPI, they are quoting CPI.
  • Sceptic001 wrote: »
    The only account currently available that protects against inflation (RPI + 50%) is the National Counties Building Society index-linked bond, which is discussed here:
    https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/2780388

    Its main drawback is that you are locked in for a fixed five-year term.

    I presume the 3.88% figure is based on the CPI (consumer prices index) inflation rate rather than RPI (retail prices index).

    Hi

    Five years could be considered a long time, however at least you know the return will be linked to RPI and for nil / basic rate tax payers it will provide an inflation beating return.

    I wouldn't be surprised if the account closes very quickly, it is a very attractive rate.

    I've found an unbiased review of it here:

    http://www.!!!!!!.uk/technical-area/savings-investments/account-in-focusinflation-beating-returns-from-the-national-counties-index-linked-savings-bond-2nd-issue/

    The Cautious Investor
  • Sceptic001
    Sceptic001 Posts: 1,111 Forumite
    edited 18 October 2010 at 4:09PM
    Thanks, Cautious Investor, that is a useful article, but it has a very bad typo on a crucial detail:
    The account is guaranteed to produce a return of at least 7.50% gross AER.

    should read:
    The account is guaranteed to produce a return of at least 7.50% gross over 5 years, equivalent to 1.46% AER.

    EDIT: The article has now been corrected.
  • lucky77
    lucky77 Posts: 220 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 100 Posts
    Looks like it's not just me then who is unaware of these 55 savings accounts paying 5% plus. I guess the statement is pure fiction or a serious misprint!
  • Reaper
    Reaper Posts: 7,357 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    I expect it is a misprint and should read "... have a choice of just 1 out of the 55 accounts available"
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 603.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.3K Life & Family
  • 261.2K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.