We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Taken to court for a speed offence

Hello,

My husband has been caught speeding in London. :mad: He was caught by a hand held device. He has now received a court summon (I wonder why wasting time with a court, a fine would have done the trick).

Anyway, lots of personal details are asked on this form. He has to give a statement of financial circumstances with details of all his income and outgoing + detail of employers.... He doesn't feel like giving so much details. Is he obliged to give these information? Are they gonna give a fine of a ridiculous amount? What are the consequences?

Thank you for your help ;)
Sophie

Comments

  • Ebe_Scrooge
    Ebe_Scrooge Posts: 7,320 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    A court appearance is usual if the speed limit is broken by more than a ceratin amount. I don't know offhand what the specifics are, but for example, doing 40 in a 30 zone will get you a fine, doing 50 means a court appearance. As I say, those aren't actual figures, but it's along those lines.

    The fact that he's been summonsed would indicate he was exceeding the speed limit by a fair bit. If the court has asked for details, then you have to provide them ( well, you can try ignoring what the court wants if you fancy your chances, but .... ! )

    The punishment can be more flexible in a court than a fixed penalty issued at the roadside. It'll generally be a combination of points and a fine, and the judge will have a bit of discretion - he may opt for a larger fine and less points, or a smaller fine and more points ( at least, that always used to be the case ). That's probably why they need details of income etc. - they want to fine you enough to punish you, without making it so much that you lose your home over it :-)
  • It would be a good idea to post this on the Pepipoo forum, they are the experts in cases like this.

    Go to http://forums.pepipoo.com/

    and start a new thread in the Speeding section.
  • HO87
    HO87 Posts: 4,296 Forumite
    Ebe Scrooge is on the right tracks. The fact that your OH has been summonsed suggests that one of two things applies. Either the alleged speed is considerably in excess of the limit or they have previously accumulated 8 or more points and may be liable to a "totting" ban.

    If it is simply a case of too high a speed then they will in line for points and a fine - which will be based on their income. Albeit that they are being to disclose all of their outgoings the only parts that really matter is (a) their gross equivalent weekly income (wages, salary or benefits) and (9) the weekly equivalent of tax and National Insurance. Subtracting (b) from (a) provides what is known as their "relevant weekly income" (RWI). Depending on the excessiveness of the alleged speed any fine levied will be a percentage of their RWI - and could be up to 150% of it.

    It would still be preferable that you disclose what the court asks for as this is more likely to be viewed as co-operation. If it is a realtively straightforward fine and points issue then they could plead guilty by letter although experience suggests that people who appear in person tend to receive lesser sentences any discount given for "taking it in person" may not, of course, offset the cost of travelling there.

    If the OH is "totting" then they will have to appear in court in person - the court will not ban them without them being there. If this is the case then I suggest that the OH posts fuller details of his case on PePiPoo where he will get far more detailed advice about how to deal with mitigation and lessening the risk of disqualification.
    My very sincere apologies for those hoping to request off-board assistance but I am now so inundated with requests that in order to do justice to those "already in the system" I am no longer accepting PM's and am unlikely to do so for the foreseeable future (August 2016). :(

    For those seeking more detailed advice and guidance regarding small claims cases arising from private parking issues I recommend that you visit the Private Parking forum on PePiPoo.com
  • sophie43
    sophie43 Posts: 19 Forumite
    Thanks very much for all your answers. Sorry I haven't had time to respond before.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.5K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.4K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 604.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.5K Life & Family
  • 261.7K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.