We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Neighbour selling house to child at below market price
Options
Comments
-
JonnyBravo wrote: »Of course there is.
No there isn't.If the house was placed on the open market and would have sold for £150k but theyre selling it for £100k that is below market price.
The price at which it sells is its market price.If the Govt sold all our remaining gold for £100 to Dave's brother* would that be below market value or is there still no such thing?
Nice strawman there.Hi, we’ve had to remove your signature. If you’re not sure why please read the forum rules or email the forum team if you’re still unsure - MSE ForumTeam0 -
Hmm - is it no one else's business? The price could be artificially reduced to avoid stamp duty which sounds immoral to me even if not illegal - similarly divesting off assets can bring entitlement to benefits (like care home fees mentioned above) that having the asset at its correct valuation would disqualify.
I would have said tax evasion and benefits fraud are everyone's business.Been away for a while.0 -
Hmm - is it no one else's business? The price could be artificially reduced to avoid stamp duty which sounds immoral to me even if not illegal - similarly divesting off assets can bring entitlement to benefits (like care home fees mentioned above) that having the asset at its correct valuation would disqualify.
I would have said tax evasion and benefits fraud are everyone's business.
The tax man will be investigating regardless of when the sale took place, should the parents need care (5% chance of this being required anyway). The IHT people will be equally interested in the actual value of the property compared to the sale price, should the parents die within 7 years. Stamp duty same deal. The taxman won't just let these things slip by (children are probably ftb, and with a valueation given by the OP of about 250k, it may well not be an issue regardless).
There is absolutely nothing illegal with what the parents are doing. And unless the children are buying the property in cash, then they will be taking a mortgage, which will give the valuation, and then work on the difference as a gifted deposit, keeping the precious house prices where they should be.
The fact the parents can afford to do this suggests they have somewhere to go, and the funds to keep themselves happily going. If the parents continue to live in the home after the sale, then yes there is a tax issue if they aren't paying rent, and one that will be picked up on.0 -
No there isn't.
The price at which it sells is its market price.
If it's been placed on the market then yes of course.Nice strawman there.
It was an example to show you how you can sell under market price by not using the market.
It's not that hard to understand surely?0 -
JonnyBravo wrote: »If it's been placed on the market then yes of course.
Fair enough. I concede.It was an example to show you how you can sell under market price by not using the market.
It's not that hard to understand surely?
It was a strawman, and don't call me Shirley.Hi, we’ve had to remove your signature. If you’re not sure why please read the forum rules or email the forum team if you’re still unsure - MSE ForumTeam0 -
Hmm - is it no one else's business?
Yes it is no one else's business - the only people required to know about the details of a transaction are the land registry, mortgage company and Inland Revenue.
If they aren't happy the OP's neighbour or their kids will hear about it; if they are happy no one else should care...
I would worry more about what the potential falling-out between neighbours as a result of your rather over-zealous interest in their purchase may bring about than the impact it may or may not have on your house price - which as you say the remortgage is 2 years away by which time all houses will be worth 57p or thereaboutsThe proof that some people really are opinionated and ignorant
Originally Posted by naff123
Long nosed Tory looking down upon everybody!0 -
Running_Horse wrote: »Would you like your income tax returns to be publicised?0
-
Running_Horse wrote: »Would you like your income tax returns to be publicised?Hi, we’ve had to remove your signature. If you’re not sure why please read the forum rules or email the forum team if you’re still unsure - MSE ForumTeam0
-
JonnyBravo wrote: »Of course there is.
If the house was placed on the open market and would have sold for £150k but theyre selling it for £100k that is below market price.
If the Govt sold all our remaining gold for £100 to Dave's brother* would that be below market value or is there still no such thing?
* If he has a brother
This begs the question 'what determines market prices'. I would say that this situation is contributory to market prices and reflects practices of people - albeit the minority - so market prices will reflect this.0 -
This begs the question 'what determines market prices'. I would say that this situation is contributory to market prices and reflects practices of people - albeit the minority - so market prices will reflect this.
What determines the market price is putting it on the market and seeing what it achieves.
If that is 40k so be it.
This clearly isn't on the open market. It doesn't really matter if a minority of people do this or not.
(There is an argument to say that if this was done in larger numbers it would increase the value of properties on the open market - due to reduction in supply)0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.7K Spending & Discounts
- 244.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177K Life & Family
- 257.6K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards