We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Investing without buying shares

Working in the City, I have found that I have to get prior approval to buy or sell any of:

Shares
Debt securities (Bonds, Debentures, gilts, etc.)
Warrants
Options, futures, CFDs, Depository Receipts

This is not a big pain, but will take a couple of days probably any time I want to do something. I'm also banned from selling any share inside a month.

I also need to send a copy of any transactions to the bank.

I can invest freely in 'Authorised Unit Trusts' and Open Ended Investment Companies

I guess under these circumstances I have to steer clear of any investment trusts (as I assume these are just classed as shares), as the hassle of having to get everything approved for regular investment would be too much.

Is it worth looking at OEICs? Do they have any advantages over Unit Trusts?
My policies are based not on some economics theory, but on things I and millions like me were brought up with: an honest day's work for an honest day's pay; live within your means; put by a nest egg for a rainy day; pay your bills on time; support the police - Margaret Thatcher.

Comments

  • dunstonh
    dunstonh Posts: 120,372 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    as I assume these are just classed as shares

    Packaged ITs are not but otherwise yes.
    Is it worth looking at OEICs? Do they have any advantages over Unit Trusts?

    In simple terms OEICs are the replacement to unit trusts. The biggest difference is that they are single priced. Most unit trusts are moving over to OEICs. When investing, you wouldnt give a second thought to whether its an OEIC or a UT most of the time and most consider them as being the same. When people say unit trusts it is a given that you are also referring to OEICs.
    I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.
  • whambamboo
    whambamboo Posts: 1,287 Forumite
    dunstonh wrote:
    Packaged ITs are not but otherwise yes.


    How would you package it?

    Is this a useful option for me?
    My policies are based not on some economics theory, but on things I and millions like me were brought up with: an honest day's work for an honest day's pay; live within your means; put by a nest egg for a rainy day; pay your bills on time; support the police - Margaret Thatcher.
  • dunstonh
    dunstonh Posts: 120,372 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    How would you package it?

    I dont package them. Some providers do. Those that are packaged are treated as plans and not as shares.
    Is this a useful option for me?

    Dont know. I know nothing about you and what you want from your money. The UK has about 13 tax wrappers for investments. Which will be right for you will depend on your circumstances.

    OEICS/UT funds are simple to understand and easiest to research. You can also place OEIC/UT funds into some of those tax wrappers as well as holding them directly (i.e. ISA, pension, investment bond). If you are going to go DIY, then UT/OEIC is probably the best place to start the research. With over 5000 active funds out there, there should be enough to suit your requirements.
    I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.
  • dh means packaged as in the sense of wrapped in an ISA. For instance Baillie Gifford do an Investment trust ISA. I'm subject to similar restrictions (although if I buy through head office they are waived - not sure I want them knowing my affairs though!). The restrictions are usually waived for discretionary managed accounts as well (ie where you don't control the account day-to-day). If you compliance dept is any good though (and I wouldn't hold out much hope there), then assuming you are investing in large cap shares, and aren't toying with investments that clients have, they shouldn't have too many problems.

    OEIC vs Unit trust makes no difference really, you can treat them as one and the same. The main difference is that unit trusts have a bid offer spread (like a share) where as OEICs usually have a 'swinging' price - so you buy and sell at the same price, and that price is affected by how many people are buying and selling the fund on that day. I personally prefer OEICs marginally, but it never enters into my mind when choosing a fund.
    I'm an Investment Manager. Any comments I make on this board should be not be construed as advice, and are for general information purposes only.
  • whambamboo
    whambamboo Posts: 1,287 Forumite
    Chrismaths wrote:
    dh means packaged as in the sense of wrapped in an ISA. For instance Baillie Gifford do an Investment trust ISA. I'm subject to similar restrictions (although if I buy through head office they are waived - not sure I want them knowing my affairs though!).

    Still need clarifying. When you say wrapped, do you mean, a self-traded ISA where you can buy and sell inside the ISA? Or is it something where the ISA contains trusts chosen by Baillie Gifford????
    My policies are based not on some economics theory, but on things I and millions like me were brought up with: an honest day's work for an honest day's pay; live within your means; put by a nest egg for a rainy day; pay your bills on time; support the police - Margaret Thatcher.
  • Kind of. A Baillie Gifford ISA will only allow you to buy ITs managed by BG (of which there are many). You can chose the proportions, but it is not "self-select". More details here.

    A packaged product is basically an FSA term for what an IFA is allowed to advise on - IFAs on the whole can't advise on individual shares, and often they don't touch ETFs or Investment trusts (although coincidentally these don't pay commission). So a packaged product would include pensions, life assurance, ISA plans (where investment trusts come in), Unit Trusts and the like. A non packaged product would include shares, direct investment trusts, gilts, corporate bonds, etc etc...

    If you are doing it yourself, and you don't want to be bothered with compliance monitoring, then don't bother with Investment trusts, the hassle will probably outweigh the benefits. Stick to UTs/OEICs and their offshore equivalents, SICAVs.
    I'm an Investment Manager. Any comments I make on this board should be not be construed as advice, and are for general information purposes only.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.4K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.4K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 601.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.6K Life & Family
  • 259.3K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.