Support for mortgage interest benefit cut by thousands of pounds

carolt

But I have a feeling that doesn't suit your agenda either, chucky.

chucky

silvercar wrote: »

You contract to pay the rent in full on time each month. Should you breach your side of the contract then the LL is entitled to go to court to secure an eviction (subject to serving notice etc ). So basically once you start not paying your rent you are on the same slippery slope as someone who doesn't meet their mortgage payments.

it doesn't matter apparently...

chucky wrote: »

AST's or Housing Act tenancy agreements don't have penalty notices to evict tenants or do they...

carolt wrote: »

No idea. Does this matter?

but... it obviously does but doesn't meet those that are desperate for those wanting BOGOF house prices.

chucky

Graham_Devon wrote: »

Yes, on this forum.

it must be true then... no wait

carolt wrote: »

But I have a feeling that doesn't suit your agenda either, chucky.

i don't have an agenda - i'm not the desperate one... chin up

carolt

I honestly haven't the faintest idea of the meaning of your last but one post, chucky.

I got the faint idea (based on past posting history) that (a) it was intended to be offensive and (b) you imagined it was witty.

But other than that, it entirely lost me.

Hope it gave you a little glow, though, on account of a and b.

chucky

carolt wrote: »

I honestly haven't the faintest idea of the meaning of your last but one post, chucky.

I got the faint idea (based on past posting history) that (a) it was intended to be offensive and (b) you imagined it was witty.

But other than that, it entirely lost me.

Hope it gave you a little glow, though, on account of a and b.

you've lost the plot today - never mind eh... tomorrows another day...

don't forget you reap what you sow...

carolt

I think that was another case of a and b.

It's a bit formulaic, isn't it chucky?

Don't you bore yourself just repeating insults continually?

Graham_Devon

chucky wrote: »

it must be true then... no wait

What must be true? My sarcastic point about it being said 56 times?

Or people having equity in houses?

The first bit, my point, HAS been said over and over, by myself, even on this thread.

The second point about people having equity in their houses...well, think this is pretty much a given for many, and not just some blase assumption by myself.

I'm not really sure what your point actually is. I was discussing something with you and suddenly the discussion has stopped and some vague sentence has been put together as a put me down.

chucky

carolt wrote: »

I think that was another case of a and b.

It's a bit formulaic, isn't it chucky?

Don't you bore yourself just repeating insults continually?

sorry must have missed the insult.

let's just hope that you have a better day tomorrow - today has been tough for you...

don't forget you reap what you sow...

carolt

A + b.

You know c and d might change your life.

Try it. You know you can if you want to.

HAMISH_MCTAVISH

carolt wrote: »

Hope it gave you a little glow

You know what gives me a little glow?

Knowing that champagne socialists with three kids on household incomes of 60K or 70K will not now be given £25,000 or so of our tax money over the next decade.

Who knew cuts would be so much fun....:D