We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Buying a share of the freehold/extending lease?
gibbon69
Posts: 1 Newbie
Hi
We live in a block of flats. 20 out of 28 have brought a share of the freehold and extended leases where necessary. This means that the manging agent has been changed. We wondered if its worthwhile doing the same.. our lease has 92 years left on it. We've lived in the flat for 7 years, we might want to sell in a few years. We have been told that it'll cost around 5K to extend the lease and buy a share of the freehold. Is it worth it? Will we be able to recoop this investment when we sell, will it make a big difference to prospective buyers?
Our mortgage adviser says do it, the managing agent said it's not worth it.
Thanks in advance for any advice
We live in a block of flats. 20 out of 28 have brought a share of the freehold and extended leases where necessary. This means that the manging agent has been changed. We wondered if its worthwhile doing the same.. our lease has 92 years left on it. We've lived in the flat for 7 years, we might want to sell in a few years. We have been told that it'll cost around 5K to extend the lease and buy a share of the freehold. Is it worth it? Will we be able to recoop this investment when we sell, will it make a big difference to prospective buyers?
Our mortgage adviser says do it, the managing agent said it's not worth it.
Thanks in advance for any advice
0
Comments
-
Most of the flats in our block recently bought the freehold and then extended the lease. At the time, our managing agent said that when any of the flats who didn't buy in come to sell, the managing agents will have to fill in a long form for the buyer's solicitors, where they'll declare that it is one of only 3 flats in the block who didn't buy in. I guess this wouldn't look great to your buyer who might then insist you buy into the freehold as condition of the sale. So you might end up buying in anyway, but the longer you leave it the more it will cost and it could slow down the selling process.
That said, someone in our block did sell without share of freehold last year (with a much shorter lease than you) so I guess it doesn't put all buyers off. I think it comes down to how good the buyer's solicitor is in whether they highlight it.
Personally, I did make the decision to buy in and I'm currently selling my flat and haven't recouped the cost. However, I don't know if selling would be even more difficult if I didn't have the share of freehold/long lease so I don't regret doing it.
Good luck with your decision.0 -
Most of the flats in our block recently bought the freehold and then extended the lease. At the time, our managing agent said that when any of the flats who didn't buy in come to sell, the managing agents will have to fill in a long form for the buyer's solicitors, where they'll declare that it is one of only 3 flats in the block who didn't buy in. I guess this wouldn't look great to your buyer who might then insist you buy into the freehold as condition of the sale. So you might end up buying in anyway, but the longer you leave it the more it will cost and it could slow down the selling process.
That said, someone in our block did sell without share of freehold last year (with a much shorter lease than you) so I guess it doesn't put all buyers off. I think it comes down to how good the buyer's solicitor is in whether they highlight it.
Personally, I did make the decision to buy in and I'm currently selling my flat and haven't recouped the cost. However, I don't know if selling would be even more difficult if I didn't have the share of freehold/long lease so I don't regret doing it.
Good luck with your decision.
This is a sensible balanced viewpoint.
At 92 years you won't need to extend the lease yet, so that won't be a worry. If a lessee has bought a "share in the freehold" then normally he doesn't have to pay for a lease extension. However the law cannot compel "shared freeholders" to grant lease extensions to fellow "shared freeholders" for free. However if they don't buy into the freehold they are more likely to have to pay roughly the same amount (or more) for a lease extension later on down the track
It does depend on how you look at it. A non-shared freeholder would probably be expected to pay ground rent (whereas frequently those with shares do not have to do so) but apart from that they will have what are usually the benefits of localised hopefully relatively cheap management costs. There are some idiots running shared freehold management companies, but usually a company run by the residents is better than one run from outside for pure profit, so even even if he doesn't get a "share" a buyer might be attracted by that. The downside is that you don't get a say in what they do.RICHARD WEBSTER
As a retired conveyancing solicitor I believe the information given in the post to be useful assuming any properties concerned are in England/Wales but I accept no liability for it.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.5K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.5K Spending & Discounts
- 247.4K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.5K Life & Family
- 261.7K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards