We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Comet Scandal
Comments
-
I agree with Booter on this one as well. If the goods have a persistant fault then I believe under the SoGA you have a right to reject them, particularly if this fault is within the 1st 6 months of purchase.
These companies cannot keep inconviniencing people carrying out repair after repair.
I don't really understand why so many people defend these shoddy companies. It really is not good service.
Yes if the fault develops they may well be within their rights to offer a repair in the first instance, but if that fault reoccurs then the consumer should be allowed to reject the goods as being faulty.0 -
shortchanged wrote: »I agree with Booter on this one as well. If the goods have a persistant fault then I believe under the SoGA you have a right to reject them, particularly if this fault is within the 1st 6 months of purchase.
These companies cannot keep inconviniencing people carrying out repair after repair.
I don't really understand why so many people defend these shoddy companies. It really is not good service.
Yes if the fault develops they may well be within their rights to offer a repair in the first instance, but if that fault reoccurs then the consumer should be allowed to reject the goods as being faulty.
Consumer reports x intermittent fault, engineer comes out but cannot find x fault. Obviously multiple visits is a waste of both your and their time, so they wish to take it to their repair centre to test it in a more convenient location - that sounds fair to me.
I certainly wouldn't call it "scandalous" and I know of very few products where you'd get a loan TV / instant refund based on a fault no-one could verify. If you wanted this level of support perhaps you should of asked for some sort of insurance / extended support plan?
I can almost predict the reply to this though... the answer is no I dont!Nothing I say represents any past, present or future employer.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.7K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454K Spending & Discounts
- 244.7K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.3K Life & Family
- 258.4K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards