We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

mortgage interest relief

2»

Comments

  • Muttleythefrog
    Muttleythefrog Posts: 20,657 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    edited 9 September 2011 at 3:20PM
    menher wrote: »
    There is more to this than meets the eye. What property was secured by the parents for the £40,000 mortgage?

    If it was secured on this house that you bought for £60,000, did you get a mortgage?

    I think you need to set down exactly who owned what and when, who was living in the house when the £40,000 was taken out?

    From what you have said you paid £60,000 for the property. Where then does the £40,000 come into the equation?

    It's a year old thread but I agree. I can't rectify in my mind how someone (parents) can hold a mortgage on a property they've sold. If I were back in my old job my alarm bells would be drowning out the tittle tattle of colleagues. Maybe some significant details here are missing and I suspect dmg24 got closest to them. That in reality he bought the property off parents for £60k although it was worth probably about £100k... the parents therefore had the money to tie up mortgage.. private arrangement to pay additional £40k was agreed to be fair between him and parents and over time he paid that. Whether he needed a mortgage himself or not.. probably he did. The arrangement may have had financial benefit for him.. paying lower fees to transact, avoiding stamp duty etc. But arguing the purchase price was actually £100k would be a problem.. it'd be hard to prove and proving it may not be in his interest..lol
    "Do not attribute to conspiracy what can adequately be explained by incompetence" - rogerblack
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 353.7K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.1K Spending & Discounts
  • 246.8K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 603.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.2K Life & Family
  • 260.8K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.