We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

quick births, are subsequent births quicker?

24

Comments

  • clairec79
    clairec79 Posts: 2,512 Forumite
    You may be surprised - 3rd babes are notorious for being strange and not doing what you expect (I don't do quick labours but my third was closer in length to my first than my second)

    While I can see your logic for the being induced and having things controlled with regard to the bleeding afterwards an induction actually increases the risk of you haemorraging - so they are trying to weigh the two things against each other
  • gratefulforhelp_2
    gratefulforhelp_2 Posts: 9,286 Forumite
    edited 23 September 2010 at 9:29AM
    Not necessarily quicker - well first stage no, second stage yes.

    DD1 40 min 2nd stage, DD2 4 min!!!

    eta that's funny about Shergar!

    Really, though, I think you need to be prepared to have a massive tantrum until someone talks this through with you, and I would find out who is in charge of patient care/customer service at the hospital and write to them demanding some proper attention.
    Please do not confuse me with other gratefulsforhelp. x
  • BeenieCat
    BeenieCat Posts: 6,567 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture Combo Breaker
    My first labour was too quick, almost didn't make it in time and went from sleeping in my bed quite happily, to having just given birth within an hour :eek:

    Midwives said my 2nd time would be quicker and urged a home birth, which i did. But luckily the 2nd labour was a lot more textbook and i had time to realise i was in labour. 2.5 hours from first contraction to birth.
  • DON79
    DON79 Posts: 3,842 Forumite
    Hello, my first labour was 6 1/2 hours, second was 2 hours 20 minutes and third was officially counted as 1 hour 43 minutes - so have to say yes am afraid - certainly in my case.... :)

    However with my third birth which was at home - I had minimal blood loss compared to the first two births. Hubby even said that there was barely any blood at all this time compared to the first two times so it may not be as severe this time around.

    I also had childcare issues which is why I got in touch with the home birth team, I was still planning on hospital but in the end I didn't have time to get there unfortunately. But I am now glad it was a home birth.

    best wishes xx
    BSC #215/No.1 Jan 09 Club
  • mumslave
    mumslave Posts: 7,531 Forumite
    First labour 10 hours
    Second: 7 hours
    Third: 6 Hours
    Fourth: I would say about 4 hours, but arrived 30 minutes after we arrived at the hospital. i lived 45 minutes drive away and I tell you know, that drive was hell! I considered a home birth, but I knew if anything went wrong i would never forgive myself. As it was, fraser was born with an infection and high temp because he had done his business in my waters.
    :starmod:Sealed Pot Challenge Member 1189:starmod:
  • Katyag
    Katyag Posts: 1,217 Forumite
    Yes Ive heard that too, baby #3 is an unknown birth lol!!!

    Ive been induced with my first 2, Im slow to start but my second stage is over in a flash! With #1 pushing was 11 mins and with #2 on my official notes pushing was less than a minute!!! Once I hit 4cms its pop, babys here!!!

    So if I can get started myself this time it will be panic stations if I get to 4 again!!!

    That said, getting to that stage with #1 took 30 hours! With #2 it took 3 days!!! Surely #3 cant be worse!!!!

    Good luck to you, birth is a wonderful achievement however it happens!
    Bringing up 2 handsome boys and 1 gorgeous girl the MSE way!
    Joseph born 19th December 2001
    Matthew born 8th August 2007
    Tara born 23rd January 2011
  • mumslave wrote: »
    First labour 10 hours
    Second: 7 hours
    Third: 6 Hours
    Fourth: I would say about 4 hours, but arrived 30 minutes after we arrived at the hospital. i lived 45 minutes drive away and I tell you know, that drive was hell! I considered a home birth, but I knew if anything went wrong i would never forgive myself. As it was, fraser was born with an infection and high temp because he had done his business in my waters.

    I had a 15 min drive from my house to the hospital and it was AGONY. My H was driving as carefully as he could and I swear I could feel every lump and bump in the road! I am not sure I'd want a 4 mile journey in the middle of my labour :o

    If I were you I'd be shouting very loudly to someone other than your booking in MW about your concerns. As lovely as a homebirth would be is it wise considering your previous history of bleeds?
    Good luck and i hope you get something sorted.
    I have a gift for enraging people, but if I ever bore you it'll be with a knife :D Louise Brooks
    All will be well in the end. If it's not well, it's not the end.
    Be humble for you are made of earth. Be noble for you are made of stars
  • mumslave
    mumslave Posts: 7,531 Forumite
    lol mine was a 27 mile and as i found out when I arrived at the hospital I was fully dilated! I could barely walk to the labour suite! I remember the contractions were coming every 3-4 minutes and i really thought i was going to have him in the tipper truck I was in! hehehehe. Happy memories :)
    :starmod:Sealed Pot Challenge Member 1189:starmod:
  • clairehi
    clairehi Posts: 1,352 Forumite
    Given your history I am surprised you have not had a referral to see a consultant already this pg. Suggest you go to the GP and explain how anxious you are (anyone would be!) hopefully they can refer you to a consultant who can talk you through possible scenarios. Sure ly you cant be the only person they have ever seen living in a rural area at risk from PPH.

    You definitely need a backup plan for transfer to hospital if your DH is not around, is there a friend or neighbour who you could call on to take you in (also to look after other kids?).
  • thatgirlsam
    thatgirlsam Posts: 10,451 Forumite
    edited 23 September 2010 at 2:41PM
    definitley ask for an appointment with your consultant, he or she will be the one deciding if you need an early induction or not

    your midwife is the expert in the 'normal' and anything deviating from that should be looked at by your consultant or a member of their team

    i would say with your history there is a very high chance they will push for an early induction
    £608.98
    £80
    £1288.99
    £85.90
    £154.98
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 259K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.