We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Why do I like...
23n1th
Posts: 1,523 Forumite
in Techie Stuff
... watching my computer defrag?
I've been doing the usual and downloading a lot and decided to defrag the HD which was over 55% fragmented. I can't stop watching it!
I really think if I ever move fully over to linux I'll missing this the most, just like watching the AV scan.
I've been doing the usual and downloading a lot and decided to defrag the HD which was over 55% fragmented. I can't stop watching it!
I really think if I ever move fully over to linux I'll missing this the most, just like watching the AV scan.
0
Comments
-
... because it's therapeutic
... or maybe hypnotic.:p
Probably the nearest thing in the Linux world is when compiling programs from source.
Watching line after line of text scroll past.:)Never interrupt your enemy when he is making a mistake.0 -
It has never failed to amaze me that in Linux it is not regarded as a complete waste of time for each user to compile exactly the same code (usually), rather than just being presented with an executable file for which no work is involved other than to run it! Reinventing wheels springs to mind...Probably the nearest thing in the Linux world is when compiling programs from source.
Watching line after line of text scroll past.:)0 -
Unlike Windows Linux runs on many different platforms so although the source may be the same the object code produced by the compiler certainly isn't. Try running a Windows Mobile program on your PC without an emulator. Even when the platform is the same there are many different versions of Linux. Having the source also means that the technically able can make changes to suit their own needs.It has never failed to amaze me that in Linux it is not regarded as a complete waste of time for each user to compile exactly the same code (usually), rather than just being presented with an executable file for which no work is involved other than to run it! Reinventing wheels springs to mind...0 -
kwikbreaks wrote: »Unlike Windows Linux runs on many different platforms so although the source may be the same the object code produced by the compiler certainly isn't. Try running a Windows Mobile program on your PC without an emulator. Even when the platform is the same there are many different versions of Linux. Having the source also means that the technically able can make changes to suit their own needs.
But unlike say a JIT language, the compilers would be pretty generic targeting the system style rather than specific, eg x86 / x64 / ARM etc.
Theres no reason why they cant pre-build these specific builds, besides isn't the whole point of a operating system is that it encapsulates the hardware and expose a common interface, I should not need to have a different build for specific hardware because linux is supposed to take care of it for me...
Being able to modifiy the source code is overrated, nearly everyone will not look at it and those thay do a significent number will ignore the licence conditions that come with modifying the source code.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 353.5K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455K Spending & Discounts
- 246.6K Work, Benefits & Business
- 602.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.1K Life & Family
- 260.6K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
