We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Bus Lane - You should have crashed

124»

Comments

  • piggeh
    piggeh Posts: 1,723 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    I think the fact they may have been too close to the person in front is pretty irrelevant. It still means (or even more so) they had to swerve to avoid an accident and so is a perfectly legitimate defence. I doubt the police will then come back and press charges for driving without due care & attention to be honest, even if that is what the person is guilty of.
    matched betting: £879.63
  • we still haven't ascertained why the car in front had to stop
  • Crabman
    Crabman Posts: 9,940 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Photogenic Combo Breaker
    who won't just accept i was swerving to avoid a possible accident
    it doesn't really matter to the appeal, fact is the car in front stopped, you had to swerve to avoid it and entered the bus lane. The para above somewhere says this is ok to avoid an accident and if they had a wide view cam it should prove this ;)
  • i suppose it could depend on the Law Lords ruling on whether the swerve in to a bus lane to avoid an accident entails the same manouvere as turning into the bus lane to avoid waiting behind a car turning right. i believe the Law Lords ruling has been prioritised above their expected judgement on the legality of the Iraq war.
  • peter999
    peter999 Posts: 7,102 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    changlyn8 wrote:
    Due to a vehicle stopping suddenly I swerved to the left and into a bus lane to avoid a collision and the possibility of injuring myself and the 2 children accompanying me.

    Much later I received a notice from the Transport for London about my car being caught on camera driving in a bau lane I wrote to the office and explained what had happened.

    However, according to the Traffice Enforcement Notice this is STILL no reason to move into a bus lane during operation times. So in effect the company is saying that I should have taken my chances and CRASHED INTO the car in front. The department has given me 28 days to pay £50.00 or wait until the fine is £100 and then write in an appeal.
    It is perfectly legitimate & legal to drive into a Bus Lane in an emergency
    or when traffic circumstances dictate this (roadworks/broken down vehicle etc.)

    Ask to view the TFL video and persevere with your appeals.

    If necessary appeal to the Parking & Traffic Appeals Service (PATAS) who will
    deal with your appeal properly & review all evidence.
    You can appeal to PATAS after TFL have rejected your initial appeals.
    .
  • I had a bus lane fine (from Camden council though, not TfL) overturned by writing a letter pointing out that the bus lane sign provided inadequate time to get out of the lane without colliding with a traffic island.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 245K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.4K Life & Family
  • 258.8K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.