We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Photoshopping
Padstow
Posts: 1,040 Forumite
Are estate agents allowed to photoshop details?
There's a house for sale that I know well. One of the photos is of the garden and surroundings, except they have been photoshopped. Trees have been added, pylon removed etc. The whole scene is a total lie.
There's a house for sale that I know well. One of the photos is of the garden and surroundings, except they have been photoshopped. Trees have been added, pylon removed etc. The whole scene is a total lie.
0
Comments
-
That sounds like it must be against the rules!
Are they a member of a professional body?
One of the major ones photoshops flames into the fire places. Badly.
0 -
We viewed a couple of houses which had clearly been photoshopped in the photos, not to that extent though. I'm not sure what they expect to acheive as you'll soon see they are a lie when you go and view anyway. My thoughts would then be that if they are having to photoshop photos then what else are they hiding.0
-
I'm impressed that you've found an estate agent able to understand Photoshop, but this would be an offence under the Property Misdescriptions Act 1991, the preamble to which states:
(b)a statement is misleading if (though not false) what a reasonable person may be expected to infer from it, or from any omission from it, is false,
(c)a statement may be made by pictures or any other method of signifying meaning as well as by words and, if made by words, may be made orally or in writing,
I Photoshopped the main picture of our house for an EA, but only to make it clearer & brighter, so it would have been hard for anyone to notice or prove we'd done that.:cool:
Putting in stuff, like trees, or removing a pylon, would be easy to prove.0 -
I took the pix of our last house we were selling for our EA as I'm a keen amateur photographer and knew I'd take better pix than they could. Anyway all pix bar 1 were as they were taken and straight out if the camera, I photoshopped the pic of the front of the house to remove the back end of a car that was parked in the way. This I think is ok, but adding bits of greenery into gardens and removing pylons is very wrong in my opinion and extremely misleading.0
-
I'd say certainly not allowed under terms of Properties Misdescriptions Act.
Do you know the address/phone no. of your local Trading Standards Office? Start there.0 -
The agents are one of the biggest and world wide, the property is on for over a million.:eek: I can't believe the nerve of them, I hope no potential buyer travels a long way, lured by the view.0
-
Lying and fraud are usually considered unwise and outwith the good old British traditions of decency & fair-play.. But I'm not surprised....0
-
I agree with this. I think there's a very big difference between tidying up a photograph to remove temporary things such as cars, people, rubbish, and adding/removing permanent fixtures such as trees and pylons.Welsh_Totster wrote: »I took the pix of our last house we were selling for our EA as I'm a keen amateur photographer and knew I'd take better pix than they could. Anyway all pix bar 1 were as they were taken and straight out if the camera, I photoshopped the pic of the front of the house to remove the back end of a car that was parked in the way. This I think is ok, but adding bits of greenery into gardens and removing pylons is very wrong in my opinion and extremely misleading.0 -
Photoshop can make miracles with picture of old not very attractive house
. I have seen photoshop house pictures too and would say you can not believe pictures that real agent showing you. 0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.4K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.4K Spending & Discounts
- 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.5K Life & Family
- 261.6K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards