Anyone using IObit Secuirty 360?

Richie-from-the-Boro

You speak [ #1 ] with forked tongue, you said precisely "" It seems rather good especially since its got resident scanning in the free version "" ignoring that you did not respond to my obfuscation that "" it doesn't figure in the top 100, let alone the top ten ""

You should imbibe a little less my friend, I did not count each individual clean from MSE but there were lots. The IObit Secuirty 360 found only the registry reference to the name not the Virii which was negated by MSE before 360 was even ran. I accept your argument that it was ' less than scientific . BTW #16 was not a settlement, just the usual corporate way of avoiding an international court case.

Do you really want me to point you to who measures MSE as in the top 100 ? "" MSE? Top 100/10 of what? ""

We have apologized for all the inconvenience, meanwhile, we have taken immediate actions to remove all disputed data

aliEnRIK

Main problem I see with it (Aside from the fact the company itself is clearly dodgy), is that it throws up MANY false positives
Thats a time bomb in the making

23n1th

Richie-from-the-Boro wrote: »

You speak [ #1 ] with forked tongue, you said precisely "" It seems rather good especially since its got resident scanning in the free version "" ignoring that you did not respond to my obfuscation that "" it doesn't figure in the top 100, let alone the top ten ""

I did not ignore anything it does have resident scanning and does seem rather good I am not saying it is just saying it SEEMS. And I also did respond however as usual you decided what you wanted to read (read below) so again top 100 of what??????????

(richie this note is for you - when I say "top 100 of what" I am refering to your statement that 360 doesn't appear in it, whatever it is. Not that MSE doesn't.)

You should imbibe a little less my friend, I did not count each individual clean from MSE but there were lots. The IObit Secuirty 360 found only the registry reference to the name not the Virii which was negated by MSE before 360 was even ran. I accept your argument that it was ' less than scientific . BTW #16 was not a settlement, just the usual corporate way of avoiding an international court case.

Lets not get into the validity of that test the guy was running a stupid amount of AVs on that system I'm surprised it even booted. As soon as a proper test is done I can make up my own mind.

Do you really want me to point you to who measures MSE as in the top 100 ? "" MSE? Top 100/10 of what? ""

Now now richie you quote with forked tongue, hold yourself to the standards you seemly expect in others please, I said precisely In the video it found 11, and MSE only found 1 what does that say about MSE? (different sentence) Top 100/10 of what?

We have apologized for all the inconvenience, meanwhile, we have taken immediate actions to remove all disputed data

Pretty sure I already posted a link to that??? Your point is?