We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
I'm seething....
Comments
-
OP, your landlady sounds an utter nightmare.
Sounds much easier, as others have said, to get LHA paid to you and set up direct debit for the rent monthly.
The extra £50/month for insurance sounds v cheeky though. Can't believe you had to do your own tenancy agreement, too. Bought it from WHSmiths, lol!
I would sort the deposit quickly though - sounds like the kind of landlady who views it as her divine right to keep your deposit when you leave. Explaining that she's liable for 3X if she doesn't will hopefully jog her in action.
Good luck.
0 -
This thread has got me wondering about LL insurance and benefit claimants. When I applied for my current tenancy, the LA made a big point of stating that I was accepted as I was classed as a disabled tenant on low income, and not a benefit claimant - even though I get some LHA and CTB, along with IB and DLA.
I thought this was related to the DDA, but now wonder if it was for insurance purposes?
What exactly is the criteria for deciding if someone is a benefit claimant for insurance purposes? I am guessing that it can't be just claiming LHA, as a lot of people who work get a small top-up of LHA.
Back on topic, I presume that the OP paid a month's rent up front when they first got the property? If not, surely it would be unfair for a LL to change from payments in arrears to payments in advance at a later date? Also seems like the LL doesn't have a clue. I had a nightmare LL many years ago, who was clueless, and made my life a misery in many ways. Better to find a decent LL, IMHO.0 -
""Back on topic, I presume that the OP paid a month's rent up front when they first got the property? If not, surely it would be unfair for a LL to change from payments in arrears to payments in advance at a later date?"
the vast majority of benefit tenants do not have the funds to provide the first months rent in advance (this is what AST's require) - AND a deposit of the same value.
So LLs who do accept benefit tenants with no cash for rent upfront find that on day two of the tenancy the tenant is already one month in arrears.... and will continue to be so until LHA is paid - usually 4-6-8 weeks later....
Benefit tenants (who cannot budget) are always in arrears by at least a month.....0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.4K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.4K Spending & Discounts
- 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.5K Life & Family
- 261.6K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards