We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Finances when splitting up
cepheus
Posts: 20,053 Forumite
My friend has been living with her X husband and 2 daughters (11 and 14) in a mortgaged house for financial reasons. Her X works, she doesn't but receives various benefits including DLA.
She has now has chosen to leave him and share with a friend due to the stress of illness but will lose all the benefits except DLA. Evidently if he had left her in the house with the children, the child support and benefits wouldn't have been enough to pay the mortgage.
So she has agreed with her X that he pays her a lump sum to make up for a potential share in the value of the house. I have no idea how much this is. However, I think this means she will then have savings which will be taken into account in the means test preventing certain benefits being paid.
I realise this is probably not enough to go on but I think the general problem is once you have part ownership of a house or savings you lose certain entitlements. If they had rented it would have been easier.
Are there any obvious options she has missed?
She has now has chosen to leave him and share with a friend due to the stress of illness but will lose all the benefits except DLA. Evidently if he had left her in the house with the children, the child support and benefits wouldn't have been enough to pay the mortgage.
So she has agreed with her X that he pays her a lump sum to make up for a potential share in the value of the house. I have no idea how much this is. However, I think this means she will then have savings which will be taken into account in the means test preventing certain benefits being paid.
I realise this is probably not enough to go on but I think the general problem is once you have part ownership of a house or savings you lose certain entitlements. If they had rented it would have been easier.
Are there any obvious options she has missed?
0
Comments
-
What other benefits does she currently receive?Gone ... or have I?0
-
tha majority of benefits go with the children so if she has the children she would get child benefit, tax credits etc but if she moves out alone she will be classed as a single person... are the children moving with her or staying with their father?0
-
She is planning to live without the children and leave them with him, so I guess that's why she loses everything.
Not sure about other benefits at present, I guess everything that is standard for a co-habiting couple with children.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.3K Spending & Discounts
- 247.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.4K Life & Family
- 261.4K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards