We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Low Cost Investement

I have a approximately £50,000 to invest long term (10 years minimum). Both my wife and myself are basic rate taxpayers and I also havean appointment booked with an IFA within the next couple of weeks.

In the meantime I have received an investment pack from Harmans offering a discounted Investment Service. Basically the fees they will charge are 1% for their funds.

I am not too happy with too much risk but would like the funds to grow a little faster than inflation.

I am a novice when it comes to investment and would not be happy managing my own portfolio.

My questions are:

Are the funds below a reasonable spread of funds with a sound history?
Are the fees reasonable ? (I know they are relatively cheap but are they reasonable for the work being done)
What alternatives are there, bearing in mind I do have an appointment with a firm of IFA's (McCauley Financial) who will obviously be wanting me to invest with them as opposed to Harmans.
The funds are:

Cautious:
Jupiter Merlin Worldwide Portfolio 13%
M&G Property Portfolio 11%
Blackrock UK Absolute Alpha 23%
Invesco Perpetual Income 13%
Invesco Perpetual Global Bond 8%
M&G Strategic Corporate Bond 32%

Conservative:

M&G Property Portfolio 20%
Blackrock UK Absolute Alpha 17%
M&G Strategic Corporate Bond 22%
Invesco Perpetual Global Bond 6%
Invesco Perpetual Income 18%
Jupiter Merlin Worldwide Portfolio 17%

Balanced:

M&G Property Portfolio 21%
Blackrock UK Absolute Alpha 12%
M&G Strategic Corporate Bond 22%
Invesco Perpetual Global Bond 4%
Invesco Perpetual Income 11%
Jupiter Merlin Worldwide Portfolio 19%
M&G Recovery 11%

Comments

  • dunstonh
    dunstonh Posts: 121,282 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Are the funds below a reasonable spread of funds with a sound history?
    Looks like a random hit and hope. Well, not quite as you can see what they are trying to do with those but its more the reason why.
    Nothing wrong with most of the funds but mixing and matching fund of funds with sector specific funds seems a bit pointless. You are not getting the benefit of the fund of funds by mixing and just paying the extra costs that come with it.

    i.e. for the cautious one, why not just use Jupiter Merlin Income portfolio if you want a lazy investor cautious portfolio. If you dont want a lazy investor spread then dont use a fund of funds.
    Are the fees reasonable ? (I know they are relatively cheap but are they reasonable for the work being done)
    You havent told us the fees. You have mentioned 1% but is that 1% initially or 1% p.a? What are the annual fees? are they normal retail or are there rebates or platform charges on top (is it bundled or unbundled to use the current industry terminology)?

    Remember that investing is about opinion. You will never get the same opinion from anyone.
    I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.
  • Reaper
    Reaper Posts: 7,357 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Looking at that I wonder whether it is a standard set of funds they have come up with once and have recommended ever since regardless of what is going on in the markets.

    For example while bonds are traditionally low risk right now some people (not everyone) think there may be a bond bubble and they are overpriced.

    Likewise property used to be considered low risk but at the moment many would consider it less so.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 604K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.4K Life & Family
  • 261.5K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.