We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Legal & General Unfair charges
anthonyball
Posts: 1 Newbie
I took out a savings plan with L&G 17 years ago. By my calculations 31% of the overall fund has been taken away in charges.
I have raised my complaint with L&G for their excessive levels of charges and was turned away. The Financial Ombudsman took a year to look at my case and recently ruled that it wasn't in their jurisdiction to rule as to the level of charges L&G were allowed to impose; they are only able to gauge if the published charging structure was correctly applied.
Does anybody have any experience of successfully pursuing such a claim for an excessive charging structure in a unit-linked savings plan? All advice welcome!
Thanks
Anthony
I have raised my complaint with L&G for their excessive levels of charges and was turned away. The Financial Ombudsman took a year to look at my case and recently ruled that it wasn't in their jurisdiction to rule as to the level of charges L&G were allowed to impose; they are only able to gauge if the published charging structure was correctly applied.
Does anybody have any experience of successfully pursuing such a claim for an excessive charging structure in a unit-linked savings plan? All advice welcome!
Thanks
Anthony
0
Comments
-
5% up front and 1.5% a year?
Not cheap, but certainly not excessive.
Their charges are clearly published. You've bought the product. I can't see where you're going to succeed with this.0 -
Which was always going to be the outcome.I have raised my complaint with L&G for their excessive levels of charges and was turned away.
Again, that is the expected outcome as the FOS has no jurisdiction in that area. Also, its not expensive and unrealistic. Not the cheapest by any means but par for the course back then.The Financial Ombudsman took a year to look at my case and recently ruled that it wasn't in their jurisdiction to rule as to the level of charges L&G were allowed to impose; they are only able to gauge if the published charging structure was correctly applied.
You havent got a hope in hell.Does anybody have any experience of successfully pursuing such a claim for an excessive charging structure in a unit-linked savings plan?
1 - you agreed to that charging structure.
2 - you appear to misunderstand the charging process with explicitly charged contacts
3 - you are looking at a 17 year old contract against todays alternatives, not those from 17 years ago
4 - and most importantly, you are time barred from any legal action.I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.4K Spending & Discounts
- 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.4K Life & Family
- 261.5K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards