We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Refund of Bus Lane Fine
Comments
-
They will probably dispute the venue rather than the claim details.
We shall see.
I commend you for taking the field, please do keep us informed.
The Council had filed an acknowledgement to my particulars of claim which bought them 28 days to a deadline by 1 October 2010.
Today (4 October 2010) I filed for judgement by default because the Council legal team had failed to file a defence to my claim.
Things are looking up:)
Watch this space and I will let you know when a CCJ has been issued and served on the Council.If it moves; sue it!0 -
I wonder if Councils collect CCJ's like clamping companies do?0
-
-
If you have difficulty persuading a local bailiff to serve upon the council you may wish to consider serving the warrant yourself.
Perhaps a local reporter would accompany you.
Councils have silverware, paintings, valuable gifts of all kinds.
I would distrain according to the scrap value so take some scales.
A photograph of you doing that would be delightful and could be used with a good strap line that may appeal to the newspaper. "The Scales of Justice" etc.0 -
Council did file defence but because they dated it for 29 September 2010 the court accepted it on Friday 8 October 2010 AFTER I had made the application for CCJ on Monday 4 October 2010. I presume this was because they had posted it, and because they posted it inside the deadline this is why the court accepted their defence.
The defence stated little in addition to my arguments and failed to debunk me. Their best effort was an aversion that "The PCN (in question, is) within the jurisdiction of the Traffic Penalty Tribunal AND NOT the County Court"! Is that the best they can come up with???
They didn't give any regulations or laws specifying this or any case law to back it up. Furthermore, they have failed to consider my arguments, and that the County Court is higher in rank in the judicial system than any tribunal hearings, since the County court is presided by a judge and is a court of law, unlike a tribunal.
I have prepared an allocation questionnaire, calling for the adjudicator of the Traffic Penalty Tribunal to attend to answer questions from the judge. I have made allowance for a further witness to attend. The hearing is to be set anytime in the next 4 months from now.If it moves; sue it!0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.4K Spending & Discounts
- 245.4K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.6K Life & Family
- 259.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards