We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
am i protected by tennancy agreement
Comments
-
if memory serves me, you cannot grant an AST for 5 years.... i think, repeat think, 3 years is the maximum the law allows... which is why OP needs to take this to a property solicitor immediately ....
I'd agree with you that the OP needs advice from a lawyer or Shelter. Artful's comments about choice of lawyer are worth noting0 -
princeofpounds wrote: »Whatever it is it's unlikely to be the normal form of rental contract, an AST, as from memory I think they can run for a maximum of 4 years. So it's probably an SAT I think from memory. Certainly it should have been done as a deed rather than a contract, I can't tell for sure if what you have qualifies as a deed without seeing it.
You should go to landlordzone forums. They have people who can answer this I know.
Assuming you hold a valid tenancy then any purchaser of the house has to abide by it. Makes it a very unattractive house to buy.
I think even if you get your way here you are going to lose a friendship.
if this is right will agree this will reduce the purchase price considerably especially if no break clause in it.0 -
This is yet another reminder not to do business with friends0
-
-
theartfullodger wrote: »a) Because the tenant wanted it - & maybe made an attractive offer dependent on 5 yrs
b) For (apparent) certainty of income..
c) (Just maybe..) there might be some legal reason - can't imagine it happening, but if property were owned by a trust required to rent for a minimum of 5 years..
However, what I always say to tenants is.. 6 months to start as fixed-term: (Maybe 12 months but I prefer not). If you are then happy with the place & I as Landlord am happy with you as tenants you can stay as long as you like (an AST can, AFAIK, keep rolling on as a periodic tenancy for ever). However, Mr prospective Tenant, you don't know if you will really be happy here (neighbours, location, better offer elsewhere, job move, family crisis) and I don't yet know if you'll be the wonderful tenant almost all tenants appear to be when you first show them round..
And, do you really really really want to be committed to not being able to give notice before 5 years time and paying the rent for 5 years?? It's gonna cost you if you change your mind!
Cheers!
Lodger0 -
This is yet another reminder not to do business with friends0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 350.4K Banking & Borrowing
- 252.9K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.3K Spending & Discounts
- 243.4K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.6K Life & Family
- 256.5K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards