PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

am i protected by tennancy agreement

2»

Comments

  • tbs624
    tbs624 Posts: 10,816 Forumite
    clutton wrote: »
    if memory serves me, you cannot grant an AST for 5 years.... i think, repeat think, 3 years is the maximum the law allows... which is why OP needs to take this to a property solicitor immediately ....
    See post 7 above Clutton. No maximum. The 3 years probably sticks in your head because its at that point that the tenancy agreement must be executed as a deed.

    I'd agree with you that the OP needs advice from a lawyer or Shelter. Artful's comments about choice of lawyer are worth noting
  • teeni
    teeni Posts: 1,193 Forumite
    edited 21 August 2010 at 7:53PM
    Whatever it is it's unlikely to be the normal form of rental contract, an AST, as from memory I think they can run for a maximum of 4 years. So it's probably an SAT I think from memory. Certainly it should have been done as a deed rather than a contract, I can't tell for sure if what you have qualifies as a deed without seeing it.

    You should go to landlordzone forums. They have people who can answer this I know.

    Assuming you hold a valid tenancy then any purchaser of the house has to abide by it. Makes it a very unattractive house to buy.

    I think even if you get your way here you are going to lose a friendship.

    if this is right will agree this will reduce the purchase price considerably especially if no break clause in it.
  • joerugby
    joerugby Posts: 1,180 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture Combo Breaker
    This is yet another reminder not to do business with friends
  • sequence wrote: »
    Why would anyone grant a lease for 5 years ?

    We need more landlord like this ;)

    As I said they are friends of mine and are only selling thinking of selling because they need the money tied up in the property i rent.
  • a) Because the tenant wanted it - & maybe made an attractive offer dependent on 5 yrs
    b) For (apparent) certainty of income..
    c) (Just maybe..) there might be some legal reason - can't imagine it happening, but if property were owned by a trust required to rent for a minimum of 5 years..

    However, what I always say to tenants is.. 6 months to start as fixed-term: (Maybe 12 months but I prefer not). If you are then happy with the place & I as Landlord am happy with you as tenants you can stay as long as you like (an AST can, AFAIK, keep rolling on as a periodic tenancy for ever). However, Mr prospective Tenant, you don't know if you will really be happy here (neighbours, location, better offer elsewhere, job move, family crisis) and I don't yet know if you'll be the wonderful tenant almost all tenants appear to be when you first show them round..

    And, do you really really really want to be committed to not being able to give notice before 5 years time and paying the rent for 5 years?? It's gonna cost you if you change your mind!

    Cheers!

    Lodger
    Because the landlord is a friend of many years I have the option to move anytime i want with a reasonable amount of notice. It is only the rent that is guaranteed to remain the same for 5 years
  • joerugby wrote: »
    This is yet another reminder not to do business with friends
    Not really, without this friend I would have been living on the streets now and even if i do have to leave this house the council will now rehouse me (it's a long story as to why they wouldn't rehouse me before) Not that I want to leave my home.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 350.4K Banking & Borrowing
  • 252.9K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 243.4K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 598K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.6K Life & Family
  • 256.5K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.