We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Age of home ownership coming to an end...
Comments
-
-
JonnyBravo wrote: »Indeed.
Really?
I'm surprised if it was that. But to be fair there are quite a few things that could have earned it. I suspect it was more the weight of evidence?
You suckered him there'Just think for a moment what a prospect that is. A single market without barriers visible or invisible giving you direct and unhindered access to the purchasing power of over 300 million of the worlds wealthiest and most prosperous people' Margaret Thatcher0 -
Negative equity has nothing to do with being tossed out on the streets, in fact it can make you less likely to be repossesed.
Why would NE make you less likely to be repossessed? if you were not in N.E. you could simple sell the property rather than relinquish and allow the bank to sell for a song.'Just think for a moment what a prospect that is. A single market without barriers visible or invisible giving you direct and unhindered access to the purchasing power of over 300 million of the worlds wealthiest and most prosperous people' Margaret Thatcher0 -
Why would NE make you less likely to be repossessed? if you were not in N.E. you could simple sell the property rather than relinquish and allow the bank to sell for a song.
Banks are less likely to reposses a property in NE as they are unlikely to get their money back. Losing your home is mainly about not making the payments.0 -
Banks are less likely to reposses a property in NE as they are unlikely to get their money back. Losing your home is mainly about not making the payments.0
-
You never own your own home. You simply flog your tripe out to service this massive debt and errr...then you die. You dont even own the lad it stands on. All land is owned by the Crown,you simply have use of it. Its all a big con trick to keep you enslaved.Feudal Britain needs land reform. 70% of the land is "owned" by 1 % of the population and at least 50% is unregistered (inherited by landed gentry). Thats why your slave box costs so much..0
-
Banks are less likely to reposses a property in NE as they are unlikely to get their money back. Losing your home is mainly about not making the payments.
If you were in NE then you would not have access to the best mortgage deals, this means your mortgage costs would be higher thus more like likely to default on payments.'Just think for a moment what a prospect that is. A single market without barriers visible or invisible giving you direct and unhindered access to the purchasing power of over 300 million of the worlds wealthiest and most prosperous people' Margaret Thatcher0 -
so why would anyone wish someone to lose their home by not being able to make the payments or wish someone to be in negative equity because that's what people are wanting and what happens when they want a HPC...
NE has no direct connection to being able to keep up payments or not, cannot see why you are putting the two together.0 -
If you were in NE then you would not have access to the best mortgage deals, this means your mortgage costs would be higher thus more like likely to default on payments.
To be frank, if a percent or so on your mortgage payments is going to make you default, then you have over commited in the first place, and are at the mercy of any interest rate increase.0 -
NE has no direct connection to being able to keep up payments or not, cannot see why you are putting the two together.
house prices drops are due to issues with the economy which results in unemployment, inflation, lack of economic growth, falls in the availability of credit, shrinking output, currency issues, reductions in trade etc... etc... to take it a bit further if you want lower house prices you also have banks collapsing or suffering massive issues - you know what that means right...
if you want lower house prices you need all of this to be happening around you.
lower house prices are a lovely romantic idea and are probably a good thing but the price will be paid for lower house prices.
be careful what you wish for...0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.2K Spending & Discounts
- 245.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.4K Life & Family
- 258.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards