We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Acadametrics July HPI +0.1%
Comments
-
Here's the Acadametrics link:
http://www.acadametrics.co.uk/LSL%20Acad%20HPI%20News%20Release%20July%2010.pdf
Some interesting data. And just to confuse the issue, they appear to have revised the extent of the previous 3 months falls.If I don't reply to your post,
you're probably on my ignore list.0 -
take the results from Jan starting at 100 and calculate the % increase since then.
Which I did.
I made the answer 1.289%, so suggested that Hamish was "rounding up" the figure to 2%.
You replied......
"it looks like it's you "rounding up" not me..."
30 Year Challenge : To be 30 years older. Equity : Don't know, don't care much. Savings : That's asking for ridicule.0 -
Which I did.
that will teach me to listen to Hamish
it should be +1.28% instead of +1.3% if you just added the perecentages together - very minor difference.
i was looking at this without checking Hamish's 2% number100 minus 1% = 99.00
99 plus 1% = 99.99
so it would need a 1.01% increase to get back to the original level of 100...0 -
you're actually right - it was Hamish that rounded it up to 2%.
that will teach me to listen to Hamish
it should be +1.28% instead of +1.3% if you just added the perecentages together - very minor difference.
i was looking at this without checking Hamish's 2% number
Nice one chucky.
I thought you might accuse me of causing trouble, but my intention was only to point out a slight error or exaggeration by Hamish. When I looked at the data given, 2% didn`t look right.
It`s academic now, as Rinoa has pointed out that the figures have been revised.30 Year Challenge : To be 30 years older. Equity : Don't know, don't care much. Savings : That's asking for ridicule.0 -
I thought you might accuse me of causing trouble, butbut my intention was only to point out a slight error or exaggeration by Hamish.
but... it may be a coincidence but the revisions actually work out to 2%0 -
you're actually right - it was Hamish that rounded it up to 2%.
that will teach me to listen to Hamish
it should be +1.28% instead of +1.3% if you just added the perecentages together - very minor difference.
i was looking at this without checking Hamish's 2% number
Maybe Hamish actually looked at today's Acadametrics link rather than assuming Brit's figures were right.
http://www.acadametrics.co.uk/LSL%20Acad%20HPI%20News%20Release%20July%2010.pdf
:TIf I don't reply to your post,
you're probably on my ignore list.0 -
Maybe Hamish actually looked at today's Acadametrics link rather than assuming Brit's figures were right.
http://www.acadametrics.co.uk/LSL%20Acad%20HPI%20News%20Release%20July%2010.pdf
:T
This seems to me looking at 2010 as many predicted, a stagnant year.
The YOY will lower and real time stagnation os what would benefit most.:wall:
What we've got here is....... failure to communicate.
Some men you just can't reach.
:wall:0 -
Maybe Hamish actually looked at today's Acadametrics link rather than assuming Brit's figures were right.
http://www.acadametrics.co.uk/LSL%20Acad%20HPI%20News%20Release%20July%2010.pdf
:T
Maybe he did, but he quoted the old figures, so I simply pointed out the error on what he posted.
:dance:30 Year Challenge : To be 30 years older. Equity : Don't know, don't care much. Savings : That's asking for ridicule.0 -
Maybe he did, but he quoted the old figures, so I simply pointed out the error on what he posted.
:dance:
So everyone is a winner then.
Hamish as he actually gets the larger HPI figure and yourself as he quoted some rubbish.
Break out the champagne..... I'm buying.
(Well actually my tenant is but that's the way this BTL lark works)0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.2K Spending & Discounts
- 245.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.4K Life & Family
- 258.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards