We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Claiming for a personal injury.
Queries
Posts: 188 Forumite
I have just received information regarding a claim I am disputing. The claimant is saying that I collided with him and he sprained his ankle (I did not). The incident was about ten weeks ago and he has not taken any time off work, he has not sought any medical help and he has not attended hospital. Surely, he would need some medical evidence to back-up this so-called claim? Any advice would be most helpful, thank you.
0
Comments
-
Is it an entirely fraudulent claim (i.e. the collision never occurred) or are you disputing that you are liable for the collision?
The short answer is yes, he needs medical evidence to back up his claim. Him not attending hospital or seeing his GP will undermine his claim but not necessarily defeat it if he can explain why he did not seek any kind of medical assistance."MIND IF I USE YOUR PHONE? IF WORD GETS OUT THATI'M MISSING FIVE HUNDRED GIRLS WILL KILL THEMSELVES."0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.4K Spending & Discounts
- 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.4K Life & Family
- 261.5K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards