We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
BBC licence fee should be scrapped, says thinktank - The Guardian
Comments
-
The idea that you can force people to pay a mandatory tax for state media, is pure and utter communism0
-
I think I object to the fact you have to buy a TV license to listen to streamed radio over the internet. There are foreign radio channels I have to listen to for work... so, I have to buy a TV license.
Otherwise, I would be happy scrapping the TV and watching iplayer.
I don't know why you are buying a TV licence to listen to the radio - you do not need a licence to listen to any radio, be it foreign or even the BBC for that matter, currently
With regard to the i player I think access should be restricted to only those who have paid their subscription/licence fee to avoid any arguments. Then those who choose to watch any downloaded TV from around the world on their computer e.g. youtube, then are completely free from hassle from BBC TV licensing's door-to-door salesman as we have currently.
Another thing I forgot to mention is the existence of BBC world which carries advertising and yet is not available to most TV viewers unless they have a satellite dish pointing at 1° west. But it iis free to air for satellite viewers to watch all over the world and the BBC also recieves money for carrying it on some pay tv platforms.
BBC online and all its websites must cost an absolute fortune to run. We are bullied into paying for it with the license tax yet everybody outside the UK who has unrestricted Internet access can use the BBC's websites. Why should we pay for that?
The BBC does not class itself as a public service broadcaster anymore it is a business -- an enterprise (BBC Worldwide which sells DVDs of Dr who etc) so now it is time for it to be financed as one with a voluntary subscription from those who choose to watch it.0 -
I think I object to the fact you have to buy a TV license to listen to streamed radio over the internet. There are foreign radio channels I have to listen to for work... so, I have to buy a TV license.
Otherwise, I would be happy scrapping the TV and watching iplayer.
You mean freeloading'Just think for a moment what a prospect that is. A single market without barriers visible or invisible giving you direct and unhindered access to the purchasing power of over 300 million of the worlds wealthiest and most prosperous people' Margaret Thatcher0 -
I think I object to the fact you have to buy a TV license to listen to streamed radio over the internet. There are foreign radio channels I have to listen to for work... so, I have to buy a TV license.
Otherwise, I would be happy scrapping the TV and watching iplayer.0 -
It amazes me how people think they are watching the commercial channels for free (ITV1 etc). These channels are funded by advertising, the cost of which is added to the price of goods and services. So we pay through the nose for ITV1 etc everytime we buy something whether we watch those channels or not, which is just the same as many of the arguments on this thread opposing the BBC licence fee on a similar basis. The only truly fair way would be pay-per view for each programme, but I guess most people would get through £145-worth pretty early in the year.0
-
Why? BTW should we scrap NHS dentistry because I only use private?
But not having the BBC in its current form is not life-threatening to some of the general public. Cutting access to cheap dentistry or free health care could be.
I do kind of see your point that it is unfair that some people who pay for private healthcare should have to contribute to the NHS but that's an entirely different debate.0 -
Surely commercial channels buy programmes off the BBC though dont they?
Maybe BBC should charge more for these:beer: Well aint funny how its the little things in life that mean the most? Not where you live, the car you drive or the price tag on your clothes.
Theres no dollar sign on piece of mind
This Ive come to know...
So if you agree have a drink with me, raise your glasses for a toast :beer:0 -
I think I object to the fact you have to buy a TV license to listen to streamed radio over the internet. There are foreign radio channels I have to listen to for work... so, I have to buy a TV license.
Otherwise, I would be happy scrapping the TV and watching iplayer.
A reasonable objection since you don't have to have a licence to listen to the radio.
Get a refund and start using iplayer for your non-live TV viewing0 -
Hm, that's interesting, I was under an impression you needed to buy a black & white tv license if you wanted Radio. Must have changed at some point.You mean freeloading
Not at all, StevieJ. As you very well know, the TV license is a tax, it is not a payment for services rendered. People can use iplayer, entirely legally and honestly, without owning a TV license. That is not 'freeloading', it is how the system is set up.“The ideas of debtor and creditor as to what constitutes a good time never coincide.”
― P.G. Wodehouse, Love Among the Chickens0 -
bristol_pilot wrote: »It amazes me how people think they are watching the commercial channels for free (ITV1 etc). These channels are funded by advertising, the cost of which is added to the price of goods and services. So we pay through the nose for ITV1 etc everytime we buy something whether we watch those channels or not, which is just the same as many of the arguments on this thread opposing the BBC licence fee on a similar basis. The only truly fair way would be pay-per view for each programme, but I guess most people would get through £145-worth pretty early in the year.
No, I don't agree with this. I don't pay for ITV, it funds itself through advertising and I have a choice over paying for any advertised product, which I don't with the license fee.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.2K Spending & Discounts
- 245.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 258.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards