We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
House prices fell by 0.5% in July - Nationwide
Comments
-
You have to laugh at the VI at the BBC with their headlines.
If it had been a rise then the headline would have said "House Prices Continue to Rsis"
Instead of telling people prices have fallen the BBC go with "eases"
Perhaps they feel somewhat responsible for their sensationalist coverage of the countries problems back in 2008, which in turn made the problem worse:
I never saw the opposite upturn logo on the big screen behind Bill Turnbull on BBC Breakfast.0 -
Blacklight wrote: »Perhaps they feel somewhat responsible for their sensationalist coverage of the countries problems back in 2008, which in turn made the problem worse:

I never saw the opposite upturn logo on the big screen behind Bill Turnbull on BBC Breakfast.
You dont actually believe that do you? :eek:0 -
not sure i agree with you because 2007 was the highest point of owner ownership ever in the UK.As opposed to thousands and thousands being priced out when prices are sky high?
if people would rather go back to pre-1980s when houses were owned by the richer minority - there were more people excluded then than now - i'm sure the same people that complain now wouldn't be happy.
what the best solution is - i don't know.
this shouldn't be a surprise to anyone and is pretty much correct.I have said it before and i'll say it again, if people really want a home they should save for a big deposit. People need to be more repsonsible.
the only problem with this is, is that the richer people that can afford to save a big deposit will be able to buy - in theory this is the better off people.
i'm not sure what the right answer is but there needs to be a balance...0 -
You will actually find Nationwide have revised the previous months down so its notNationwide
Mar + 1.0%
Apr + 1.1%
May + 0.5%
Jun + 0.1%
Jul - 0.5% :j:beer:
http://www.nationwide.co.uk/hpi/historical/Jul_2010.pdf
Halifax
Mar + 1.0%
Apr - 0.1%
May - 0.4%
Jun - 0.6%
http://www.lloydsbankinggroup.com/me...dexMay2010.pdf
Land Registry
Mar - 0.3%
Apr +0.2%
May - 0.2%
Jul + 0.1%
Acadametrics
Mar - 0.5%
Apr - 0.7%
May - 0.2%
Jun - 0.5%
http://www.acadametrics.co.uk/acadHousePrices.php
Good day, I reckon land registry will go properly negative next month or month after due to delay.
The trend is clearly down :T
Mar + 1.0%
Apr + 1.1%
May + 0.5%
Jun + 0.1%
Jul - 0.5%
but now
Mar + 1.0%
Apr + 1.1%
May + 0.4%
Jun + 0.0%
Jul - 0.5%0 -
Chaos_A.D. wrote: »Not so if people were forced to sell, the current base rate and banks not repossessing along with government paying people's interest however means forced selling is not on the cards at this time.
The question is I guess, is can the hundred's of thousand's of households that are underwater able to get out of their current predicament whilst these policies are still in force ?
Absolutely, but is there any sign of rocketing rates?
Each year that passes, inflation and low rates ease the burden that little bit more. We've done 2 years of "payback" already. How many more are needed? 5?
I'll guess there will be no mass repossessions, unemployment will climb a bit more then stabilise, inflation will run circa 4% and wages will eventually reflect that. Lending will remain tight for 5 years house prices will drop nominally a little but inflation will be the real impact for them meaning in real terms they get much cheaper.0 -
http://www.nationwide.co.uk/hpi/historical/Jul_2010.pdf
Non-seasonally adjusted price is down 0.4%.
Another 6 months of 0.5% falls would be needed for YoY to be flat.
So in the previous 5 months they rose 3.4%???Not Again0 -
angrypirate wrote: »You will actually find Nationwide have revised the previous months down so its not
Mar + 1.0%
Apr + 1.1%
May + 0.5%
Jun + 0.1%
Jul - 0.5%
but now
Mar + 1.0%
Apr + 1.1%
May + 0.4%
Jun + 0.0%
Jul - 0.5%
Did I read that the LR revised May from -0.2 to +0.2 also?Go round the green binbags. Turn right at the mouldy George Elliot, forward, forward, and turn left....at the dead badger0 -
I agree. It's fairly basic economics that lower price => lower quantity supplied
I can see that for newly manufactured goods. In the case of houses, they already exist, and demand is always going to be very high, just currently its at a lower price point.
You could say that theres a tidal wave of buyers waiting in the wings if people who arent in negative equity (which is most homeowners) are a bit more reserved with their asking prices.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.5K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.5K Spending & Discounts
- 247.4K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604.3K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.5K Life & Family
- 261.8K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards