First Utility - what are they up to?

TrustMe

KimYeovil wrote: »

That does not contradict my point. Try again.

Excuse me but it does - and don't tell me what to you, you half-wit!

As a follower of these forums for the last 2 years I only got involved because of this issue - I have no grand design of being top dog.

I however have noticed that almost all of your recent comments are to demean other posters (esp Newbie's like myself). To show you what that feels like I will point out that you have posted 6 comments per day over the last 2 years and are almost always online on this forum. Despite my disability I still have a life - now I suggest you get yourself one, because it is pretty obvious you lack one - now how does that feel?

BTW I won't bother replying to any inane response from you.

gatita

Trustme, I totally agree with your comments regarding KimYeovil, he comes across as the most objectionable person, he/she never has a pleasant word or comment for anyone. As you mentioned he/she are almost always online waiting to post yet another disagreeable comment. He/she are to be pitied really, so lets just ignore the nasty rantings from now on shall we?

simondav

KimYeovil wrote: »

So you want the elderly and disabled to subsidise your supply. Why are you not prepared to pay your fair contribution?

A much higher fixed standing charge per day will hurt the elderly and disabled more because this charge cannot be avoided, and many of these people are on a low income so suffer more in compariosn.