We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Mortgage lending up
Comments
-
Blacklight wrote: »Where do you live !!!!!!? I'm in the market for a good few places to rent out and prices have been falling off a cliff round your way for so long they must be paying people to take them away.
i did tell you b4 that weve got a residents commitee to keep the oiks out. so im sorry but youll have to look elsewhere. but good luck to you all the same0 -
Graham_Devon wrote: »Mortgage payments at the lowest proportion of home movers income for 35 years. Surely people can't continue arguing that base rates have no direct impact on the housing market when you see research like that!!
Graham,
If it was the base rate that had a direct impact on the housing mortgage, it would have reflected so when the base rates first hit 0.5%
People are saving as they move onto the SVR rates or take out new mortgage rates which are comparitavely lower than they have been previously.
All goes to point that currently mortgages are more affodable (35 years according to the report percentage of mortgage interest to income):wall:
What we've got here is....... failure to communicate.
Some men you just can't reach.
:wall:0 -
What I'd like to know regarding the fall/rise of the number of approved mortgages is the corresponding fall/rise in mortgage applications. Has the ratio increased since the start of the recession. Is this a valid statistic anyway ?
Linda0 -
Blacklight wrote: »Also, 'round my way' is the correct term.
Where do you live !!!!!!? I'm in the market for a good few places to rent out and prices have been falling off a cliff round your way for so long they must be paying people to take them away.
Maybe not the best BTL opportunities.
So some posters have commented.lemonjelly wrote: »If he is from west brom, any property there is worthless as it is the @rsehole of the universe anways...;):wall:
What we've got here is....... failure to communicate.
Some men you just can't reach.
:wall:0 -
Dirk_Rambo wrote: »i did tell you b4 that weve got a residents commitee to keep the oiks out. so im sorry but youll have to look elsewhere. but good luck to you all the same
Do you realise that you're singlehandedly discrediting any bearish argument? You're doing nothing to help your cause.
In fact, maybe that's the answer, maybe you're the alias of Hamish and you're trying to make all bears look stupid.This is a system account and does not represent a real person. To contact the Forum Team email forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com0 -
IveSeenTheLight wrote: »Graham,
If it was the base rate that had a direct impact on the housing mortgage, it would have reflected so when the base rates first hit 0.5%
People are saving as they move onto the SVR rates or take out new mortgage rates which are comparitavely lower than they have been previously.
And why are SVR's so much cheaper all of a sudden?
Because the base rates are so low maybe?
Are we still arguing therefore that base rates somehow do not have a direct effect on the housing market?!0 -
IveSeenTheLight wrote: »I understand West Bromwhich is not that desireable an area.
Maybe not the best BTL opportunities.
.
ps youve spelt west bromich worong.0 -
Graham_Devon wrote: »Are we still arguing therefore that base rates somehow do not have a direct effect on the housing market?!
It depends on what you think that effect is. All this talks about (well the point you use) is remortgages and new loans being cheaper than 35 years ago as a percentage of wages for those that move house.
So those with equity and want to move can get cheaper mortgages, that is not the entire housing market.
So state what parts of the housing market you think it affects, because for FTBs it is the cheapest since 2004 and base rate then was 4%-4.75%.
Surely that stat alone tells you base rate does not affect all.0 -
Graham_Devon wrote: »And why are SVR's so much cheaper all of a sudden?
Because the base rates are so low maybe?
Are we still arguing therefore that base rates somehow do not have a direct effect on the housing market?!
If it was "all of a sudden" they would have dropped as the base rate dropped.
They stayed higher as the lenders thought the base rate wouldn't stay as low as it has for as long as it has and thus marketted mortgage rates for the base rate rising.
The mortgage rates are lowering as they now believe that the base rate will still low for longer.
It's not a direct affect, it's an indirect affect.:wall:
What we've got here is....... failure to communicate.
Some men you just can't reach.
:wall:0 -
Dirk_Rambo wrote: »MrStalker, youve done it again and mixed me up with MrEnglish whose the 1 who actually lives there.
ps youve spelt west bromich worong.
P.s. you've spelt 'youve' and 'worong' wrong
P.P.S. see belowIveSeenTheLight wrote: »:wall:
What we've got here is....... failure to communicate.
Some men you just can't reach.
:wall:0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.2K Spending & Discounts
- 245.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 258.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards