We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Plan to change private pension inflation link

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/10557675.stm

Private pensions to be index linked to CPI, not RPI.
"This looks like a sensible change which would align public and private sector pensions and generally reduce the burden on pension schemes," he said.

Public sector pensions were re-linked to CPI in the recent Emergency Budget.

See how this divide and rule nonsense works now?
Politics is not the art of the possible. It consists of choosing between the disastrous and the unpalatable. J. K. Galbraith
«13456713

Comments

  • carolt
    carolt Posts: 8,531 Forumite
    Excellent post, Sir Humphrey.

    Let's see the Tories defend that one now.
  • chucknorris
    chucknorris Posts: 10,795 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Sorry I admit I am certainly nowhere near average let alone an expert on pensions, but does this only effect final salary schemes?
    Chuck Norris can kill two stones with one birdThe only time Chuck Norris was wrong was when he thought he had made a mistakeChuck Norris puts the "laughter" in "manslaughter".I've started running again, after several injuries had forced me to stop
  • Exocet
    Exocet Posts: 744 Forumite
    carolt wrote: »
    Excellent post, Sir Humphrey.

    Let's see the Tories defend that one now.
    To be fair Gordon ripped us off with the dividends scam. It would seem that private or public pensions are going to be hit whichever party is in power. We're all going to be working in Homebase till we're unable to move at this rate.
  • Andy_L
    Andy_L Posts: 13,075 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Sorry I admit I am certainly nowhere near average let alone an expert on pensions, but does this only effect final salary schemes?

    Yes "People in dormant and occupational schemes would be affected"

    Obviously the question is would it be like the change to the rules that relaxed indexation to the lower of RPI or 2.5/5% and would it only apply to future service?
  • Sir_Humphrey
    Sir_Humphrey Posts: 1,978 Forumite
    Andy_L wrote: »
    Yes "People in dormant and occupational schemes would be affected"

    Obviously the question is would it be like the change to the rules that relaxed indexation to the lower of RPI or 2.5/5% and would it only apply to future service?

    It covers all entitlements.
    Politics is not the art of the possible. It consists of choosing between the disastrous and the unpalatable. J. K. Galbraith
  • vivatifosi
    vivatifosi Posts: 18,746 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Mortgage-free Glee! PPI Party Pooper
    It covers all entitlements.

    That's just bonkers. So does that mean you could have a closed scheme, with no current active members and no deficit being forced into deficit purely because the government changes the rules? I'm seriously fed up with government tinkering in private pensions.
    Please stay safe in the sun and learn the A-E of melanoma: A = asymmetry, B = irregular borders, C= different colours, D= diameter, larger than 6mm, E = evolving, is your mole changing? Most moles are not cancerous, any doubts, please check next time you visit your GP.
  • Sir_Humphrey
    Sir_Humphrey Posts: 1,978 Forumite
    vivatifosi wrote: »
    That's just bonkers. So does that mean you could have a closed scheme, with no current active members and no deficit being forced into deficit purely because the government changes the rules? I'm seriously fed up with government tinkering in private pensions.

    It is the indexation for payments. So it will reduce payments on all accrued pension provision.

    This govt is bonkers, trust me!
    Politics is not the art of the possible. It consists of choosing between the disastrous and the unpalatable. J. K. Galbraith
  • Exocet
    Exocet Posts: 744 Forumite
    It is the indexation for payments. So it will reduce payments on all accrued pension provision.

    This govt is bonkers, trust me!
    Well maybe. Trouble is though, we just can't afford it anymore. I thought everyone knew that. It's not just the UK Tories - it's across Europe.
  • treliac
    treliac Posts: 4,524 Forumite
    From the article:
    We are all having to take more and more responsibility for our own retirement as the state and employers struggle to cope with an ageing population."


    I thought that paying into a pension was taking responsibility for one's own retirement. What are we expected to be doing?

    And if people can't/don't make provision for themselves.... well won't the state be paying for them by way of benefits in any case? Or are elderly people going to be left 'dying by the side of the road'?
  • Sir_Humphrey
    Sir_Humphrey Posts: 1,978 Forumite
    Exocet wrote: »
    Well maybe. Trouble is though, we just can't afford it anymore. I thought everyone knew that. It's not just the UK Tories - it's across Europe.

    If we can afford to bail out the banks, pay chief executives ludicrous amounts, have the lowest level of income tax since WW2 and allow gaping tax loopholes we can afford to give people a decent standard of living.

    It might mean changing some of the things I listed however.
    Politics is not the art of the possible. It consists of choosing between the disastrous and the unpalatable. J. K. Galbraith
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.4K Life & Family
  • 258.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.