We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

wanting to transfer old slides..

j.e.j.
j.e.j. Posts: 9,672 Forumite
1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
Hallo

I’m wanting to transfer a load of 35mm slides which have been sitting up in the loft for years onto cd or onto the computer. Someone’s kindly lent us an Epson scanner for the purpose, which’ll save us from having to pay to get them done, but now we’re just trying to figure out how to use it :think:

Has anyone got any experience of scanning slides? I’m finding that the although the slides are square the image is coming out oblong with black panels either side. When I try to customise it it just lops off bits off the photograph. I’m having trouble getting the colour to match the originals, too. The slides are pretty old, so I don’t expect them to come out brilliantly, but would like to get them as good as I can.

Comments

  • fwor
    fwor Posts: 6,943 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    My dad only recently finished processing the hundreds of slides he had.

    He never found an alternative to scanning and then using Photoshop to tweak the hue and saturation settings, because he had a mix of different media (the kodak material tended to be very orange, while the Fuji had a blue emphasis).

    If you are lucky and have consistent material, you may find a formula that can be applied to all, but it's more likely that every one will need specific settings. IIRC he reckoned he was doing well to get through ten an hour...
  • Personally, I'd do it along these lines. http://www.ehow.com/how_4475176_convert-35mm-slides-cd.html

    But instead of doing one slide at a time. Why not do as many as will fit on the flatbed scanner at once (with some border between them all)You will get about 8-10 pictures per scan then. Scan them all in, then slowly start the cropping/colour changing process. It's still a tedious process tweaking the colours but least it reduces the scanning time by a lot.

    The above link suggests cutting a slide-shaped-hole in the centre of a piece of card I presume to remove the shadow/black panels at the sides of the slide.

    It also suggests using a torch to illuminate the slide from behind, this might make the colours better.

    How many have you got to do?

    Hope this helps.
  • j.e.j.
    j.e.j. Posts: 9,672 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Hi, thanks for the replies

    Yes, it's a slow old process, - seems to take about 5 minutes just to scan or preview one image. The scanner will take 8 slides at a time.

    I've got Adobe Photoshop so I'll have a go at tweaking the images in there. I've got about 1000 slides to transfer.. Looks like i've got myself a bit of a long-term project here:eek::rotfl:
  • totalsolutions
    totalsolutions Posts: 3,110 Forumite
    Nikon Coolscan scanners are where you need to look. Very good, high quality output, scanning the neg completely as required. Stop using the flatbed unit as you may find you are wasting your time and effort and more time in Photoshop and all for a very low image quality when the negs are in high detail colour. Now the bad news it's expensive the buy. Try for a second hand unit.
  • j.e.j.
    j.e.j. Posts: 9,672 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    totalsolutions
    the negatives haven't been kept, unfortunately. I've just got the slides
  • totalsolutions
    totalsolutions Posts: 3,110 Forumite
    Same thing! Scan them, come out far better then you would expect with a coolscan. Positive or negative it's all the same just inverted.
  • sickparrot
    sickparrot Posts: 816 Forumite
    j.e.j. wrote: »
    totalsolutions
    the negatives haven't been kept, unfortunately. I've just got the slides

    Slides never had negatives, the film in the slide is the film that was in the camera.

    Slides are notoriously tricky to scan, they have a very low dynamic range compared to negatives, and they almost always end up coming out looking a bit flat and grey. I have a relatively cheap Plustek film scanner and it's great with B+W and colour negatives but struggles with slides, I have to muck about with the settings on every single one which is a time consuming process, and even then there is no consistency when looking at all the scans as a whole. It takes me about 4 hours to process 50 slides.

    It's a tad annoying when you hold a slide up to the window and it's all bright and colourful, then when you scan it it looks like it's been taken on a dull day. Maybe I need to spend £1000 on a scanner.
    Out on blue six..
    It's Chips and Jackets, Peas and Trousers.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 353.6K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.1K Spending & Discounts
  • 246.6K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 603K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.1K Life & Family
  • 260.6K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.