We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Renting - is this right?
Comments
-
Cannon_Fodder wrote: »Oh, yes it is! She might not have planned it as a business, but being a landlord has commercial, legal and financial obligations.
Her choice to rent somewhere else has no bearing on the choice to rent out a property. (she could go home to the parents/lodge with friends/buy another property if she had the cash to convert first mortgage into BTL and put a deposit on new place, a host of choices..)
How can it cost more elsewhere? Assuming she is charging the going rate for the type of property, the same type of property that she moves to will be much the same rate round the corner, a few streets away, or whatever.
Even downsizing costs more than she would get for her house after agency charges - I dont know why - thats life I suppose?
If she chooses not to charge the going rate, that is a business decision she may come to regret.
Has she tried asking her Lender if they will port the mortgage to a property of the same value elsewhere ? Sometimes, they don't mind if the end result of her negative equity position comes out the same...
No she cant as she has just started her own business, so has no job history.
She needs to tackle the serious element of stalking/abuse properly. Get him charged for it and locked up, if need be. Who would want to be the tenant when the abusive ex has been knocking on windows at 3am for a couple of weeks? Its not going to be a solution, imo.
SHe has been there done that got the tee-shirt with the stalking business, this would be last case scenario.0 -
if the property she is going to rent out is mortgaged and she pays the mortgage then she can claim the mortgage interest element as a legitimiate expense against her rental income...
give us some figures then we can advise more successfully0 -
How much negative equity? Can she speak to the lender about selling the house and turning the shortfall into an unsecured loan?0
-
can she get permission from the lender to let the property? Some charge a fee and won't do it if there isn't sufficient equity in the property. I don't know how agency fees work but wonder whether the agent may expect their full percentage upfront rather than as the rent is paid once they've found a tenancy - perhaps an experienced landlord could answer this and estimate potential upfront expenses that the landlord needs to find for a managed let.0
-
Thanks to all - It looks like it is just not feasible for her to do it - she wants to move and so I think she will have to just wait until she is able to remortgage.0
-
As no one has thrown any numbers in I will!
If she has negative equity I'd be surprised if she would have ANY tax to pay, as clutton said - she has to make a profit first
Numbers
Rent on "new place" £600/month
Mortgage on "old place" £700/month (£650 interest repayment £50 capital repayment)
Rent being charged on "old place" £650/month
--
Profit on renting out "old place" (£650-£650) - £0 - no tax to pay as she makes no profit - only the interest element of the mortgae is an allowable expense.
Cashflow analysis -
before moving - paying £700
after moving - paying out £600 rent £700 mortgage - recieving £650 rent - net result £650 paying out - £50/month better off
It may be that you/she are thinking of the wrong cost to allow against when working out the tax - forget the rental she would be paying on the new place, what matters is the mortgage interest she is paying out on the old place.
Personally think the whole plan is bad news - if the guy is that irrational, he may to try to make her life hard, by making the tenants life hard - if they move out she is stuck with a rental contract on her new place, and no rent coming in for the old place.
Other things to consider
Does she own the house - or does the ex have a share/any rights to it?
Does she have any chance of paying off the negative equity?Unless it is damaged or discontinued - ignore any discount of over 25%0 -
Get a beefy lodger in.0
-
Any friends/family she can lodge with to cut the costs down until he goes away?0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.6K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.9K Spending & Discounts
- 244.6K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.2K Life & Family
- 258.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards