PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Stamp duty mitigation scheme - is it for real?

Options
245

Comments

  • GDB2222
    GDB2222 Posts: 26,171 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    DarrenTMH wrote: »
    Hi all

    there is an existing thread on this subject, it's almost 4 years old now and 3 pages long. I posted a comment on page 3 which is pretty comprehensive on the subject which may be of interest to you. You can find it by clicking on my pic and looking at my previous posts in the 'statistics' tab.

    best regards

    Darren, are most of the SDLT schemes as expensive as this? I've seen tax mitigation schemes in the past where the fees were up to 20% of the tax saving - most were less. Here, we are looking at nearly 60% (including VAT), which seems wildly excessive to me.
    No reliance should be placed on the above! Absolutely none, do you hear?
  • jockosjungle
    jockosjungle Posts: 759 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 500 Posts Combo Breaker Home Insurance Hacker!
    A scheme disclosed to HMRC is just that, they've told them about it. It'll then be fore lawyers and tribunals to decide if it works or not. You may get lucky and it works and you'll save £1500.

    If it doesn't you'll pay the tax you owe plus interest. You will also receive a penalty based on a percentage of the tax owed. Since you have used a marketed avoidance scheme, you cannot claim you made a simple mistake, you intentionally tried to avoid tax. You can look up the tax penalties yourself and they changed recently, you'll be looking at the minimum of a deliberate error which might be around 50%.

    Depends on how confident you are the scheme works

    R
  • we have just had a similar conversation with an estate agents in-house financial advisor who offered us this service (so long as we use an appropriate solicitor).
    comes to down to paying them 1.5% of purchase price + vat (property value 495000). we then get back the remainder of the SDLT.

    Have since spent the evening searching all I can on it!
    We were given a sample letter of engagement and the killer is in the client declaration at the bottom:

    "we/i understand that in the course of executing the planning a company will be set up in my/our name/s as a vehicle for the purchase....."

    Luckily, Father-in-law is a chartered accountant and FD - and used to be a partner in a major accountancy firm. He is going to run the details past his old firm for advice.

    But I suspect it really is an avoid-with-a-bargepole scheme....
  • Oakman
    Oakman Posts: 13 Forumite
    I've just received a letter from the IR demanding nearly £9K, for a purchase that completed in October 2009.

    I'm not sure what to do to be honest....
  • Oakman wrote: »
    I've just received a letter from the IR demanding nearly £9K, for a purchase that completed in October 2009.

    I'm not sure what to do to be honest....

    Ha ha ha ha ha!
  • Oakman wrote: »
    I've just received a letter from the IR demanding nearly £9K, for a purchase that completed in October 2009.

    I'm not sure what to do to be honest....

    Snap! Well £13.5K, i've contacted the co that operated the scheme and they are going to call me back. Suggest you do the same. Looking back at the paperwork and speaking to some poeple it seems the key point is did they cover you if HMRC enquired within 9 months only. In our situations its beyond 9 months so they have issued a discovery assessments as they are out of time.
  • GDB2222
    GDB2222 Posts: 26,171 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    Oakman wrote: »
    I've just received a letter from the IR demanding nearly £9K, for a purchase that completed in October 2009.

    I'm not sure what to do to be honest....

    Pay the £9k or pay a lot of money to contest it with no certainty you'll be successful. You could talk to the people who peddled the scheme to see whether there is a group of people in the same position as you who could band together to share costs.

    Hopefully, you set aside the SDLT money in 2009 on the basis that these schemes are certainly not bulletproof? Are HMRC charging a lot of penalties on top?
    No reliance should be placed on the above! Absolutely none, do you hear?
  • Not quite clear if just income tax...but who is willing to risk the HMRC on their backs for 5 years..?

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-12544069

    "Tax dodgers face far greater scrutiny of their affairs under a new HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) plan."

    "The Revenue says anyone who evades tax will have their financial affairs watched closely for up to five years to make sure they do not re-offend."
    "The plan is called the Managing Deliberate Defaulters (MDD) scheme."

    "Where the tax loss is over £5,000, HMRC will send a letter to businesses in the MDD programme requiring additional information to be submitted along with their tax returns for the following five years,
    Act in haste, repent at leisure.

    dunstonh wrote:
    Its a serious financial transaction and one of the biggest things you will ever buy. So, stop treating it like buying an ipod.
  • FTBFun
    FTBFun Posts: 4,273 Forumite
    Oakman wrote: »
    I've just received a letter from the IR demanding nearly £9K, for a purchase that completed in October 2009.

    I'm not sure what to do to be honest....

    Now there's a surprise. I'm afraid you're going to have to pay the tax over - best to do it asap.

    This is what happens when you use a bunch of unqualified cowboys to put this crap through.

    Any comments DarrenTMH?
  • It may not be £9k (or £13.5k in my case) as these schemes come with a caveat to say they will refund the fees if the scheme fails. The question is though if that repayment is in relation to the 9 months (HMRC's normal enquiry window) or 6 years (HMRC window to issue a discovery assessment). My scheme, not sure not read the small print yet.

    Agreed in any event you cannot take on HMRC on your own.

    HMRC did advise that they would be attacking these schemes in December last year. Must confess as my purchase was November 2009 thought I had escaped. Ah well, shockingly there are still a multitude of people offering these schemes.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 350.8K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.5K Spending & Discounts
  • 243.8K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 598.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.8K Life & Family
  • 257.1K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.