We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
what information shows up on a survey
Comments
-
huki wrote:There is a down side to having a full structural survey done and that is that if they find some defects that are not particularly serious, that you maybe could fix up at a later time yourselves, the mortgage lender may withhold some of the monies untill these are rectified, or you may have to pay for a specialised check to be done to asses the defects in more detail.
But the lender doesn't see the full structural survey. The lender gets its own, separate valuation
Warning ..... I'm a peri-menopausal axe-wielding maniac
0 -
jamminjamaica wrote:there were rummor that there may have been a fire at the house. would that show up on any kind of survey? or how could we find out?
I have to admit that if there had been a serious fire, I would be inclined to have a full structural survey - just to give me piece of mind that the fire didn't cause any structural damage. Or if it did, that the necessary repairs were carried out to satisfactory standards.
But it really depends on how serious the fire was ...
In our village, if that was the rumour, you'd find out the truth was that the property was built on the site where the village fireman used to live :rotfl: Beware small village gossip!
Warning ..... I'm a peri-menopausal axe-wielding maniac
0 -
Usually a house purchase is the biggest purchase anyone will make. If you've got doubts about the integrity of the structure due to possible fire damage then surely a few hundred pounds spent on a survey is worth it for peace of mind. By the way a mortgage valuation is exactly that - it's not a survey.0
-
Doozergirl wrote:Your house should still be covered by it's NHBC guarantee for any big problems.
I heard that the NHBC guarantee is not worth the paper it's written on. There has been sevral reports both in the papers and on TV about this, and personally, I would not trust them.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.4K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.4K Spending & Discounts
- 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.5K Life & Family
- 261.6K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards