We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

An end to the free swim for kids and over 60's

Options
Thats one axe thats hit home with me, I will now have to cut my swimming sessions down from 4 to 1 or 2 . :mad:

From the end of July there is going to be no more free swimming for the under 16's and over 60's you just knew this was coming but that doesn't make it any easier to swallow... swimming is the one excercise that many elderly people can manage to do even with health problems but its expensive when you are on a fixed income... they say as a justification that pensioners will still go swimming even if they have to pay ... yes we will but not nearly as often and I for one will have to cut it by half at least and its really been helping my arthritis going so often..... I'm so mad ....
#6 of the SKI-ers Club :j

"All that is necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing" Edmund Burke
«13456

Comments

  • Errata
    Errata Posts: 38,230 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    I'm struggling to understand the logic behind this. If the pool is open and staffed it doesn't matter if there are 60 pensioners enjoying a free swim at the same time or none, the overhead costs are the same.
    .................:)....I'm smiling because I have no idea what's going on ...:)
  • tanith
    tanith Posts: 8,091 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture Combo Breaker
    I don't understand it either but I think there is some sort of payment per swim made but I don't know by whom or to whom , but there is no way of knowing how many people swim for free anyway as they don't keep check of who goes in for free... maybe someone will come along and explain how it works as I know not all councils signed up to the scheme ...
    #6 of the SKI-ers Club :j

    "All that is necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing" Edmund Burke
  • Hannah_10
    Hannah_10 Posts: 1,774 Forumite
    edited 18 June 2010 at 6:41AM
    Free swims for pensioners in my area are set at the times of day pretty much no one else wants the pool except them. Paying customers only occassionally swim then too, not because the older people are in the water, but because the 8.30-9.30am slot on a Monday morning suits very few people! Swimming pensioners might cost the local authority a few pence more in water and electric when they use the shower but other than that I can't see where the problem lies.

    Sounds to me like it's more of a money-generating excercise than a money-saving excercise. Sadly I think it'll backfire due to the cost to the NHS of increasing the strictly medical treatment of common pensioner conditions like arthiritis, alzheimers and high blood pressure to compensate for the patients decreased activity and thus worse health. Whoever thought this was a good idea had serious tunnel vision when it came to what "cost cutting" actually is!
    I refuse to be afraid of the big bad wolf, spiders, or debt collection agencies; one of them's not real and the other two are powerless without my fear.
    (Ok, one of them is powerless, spiders can be nasty.)


    As of the last count I have cleared
    [STRIKE]23.16%[/STRIKE] 22.49% of my debt. :(
  • BLT_2
    BLT_2 Posts: 1,307 Forumite
    Errata wrote: »
    I'm struggling to understand the logic behind this. If the pool is open and staffed it doesn't matter if there are 60 pensioners enjoying a free swim at the same time or none, the overhead costs are the same.

    It matters if you have paid to get in with your children and are crammed in a pool with 60 old aged pensioners with weak bladders filling up the pool.

    Still trying to work out why being over 60 gets you a free ride when the pension retirement age is 65.
  • Katiehound
    Katiehound Posts: 8,125 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Just to say- if you are taking your children to the pool they go free ( at the moment)and only you personally have had to pay.

    I think the reason over 60s qualify is because women historically retired at 60 and men at 65- but due to equality laws and they have had to issue bus passes etc to men over 60....and of course the pension age is increasing gradually from now on.

    Short sighted all round cutting the free swims as both pensioners and children need more exercise . The next thing will be that pools and leisure centres will start to close as they loose oodles of money......
    Being polite and pleasant doesn't cost anything!
    -Stash bust:in 2022:337
    Stash bust :2023. 120duvets, 24bags,43dogcoats, 2scrunchies, 10mitts, 6 bootees, 8spec cases, 2 A6notebooks, 59cards, 6 lav bags,36 angels,9 bones,1 blanket, 1 lined bag,3 owls, 88 pyramids = total 420total spend £5.Total for 'Dogs for Good' £546.82

    2024:Sewn:59Doggy ds,52pyramids,18 bags,6spec cases,6lav.bags.
    Knits:6covers,4hats,10mitts,2 bootees.
    Crotchet:61angels, 229cards=453 £158.55profit!!!
    2025 3dduvets
  • roddydogs
    roddydogs Posts: 7,479 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    The over 60 free was optional to the councils.....a lot of councils said they couldnt afford it (mine) It was not a universal freebie.
  • margaretclare
    margaretclare Posts: 10,789 Forumite
    roddydogs wrote: »
    The over 60 free was optional to the councils.....a lot of councils said they couldn't afford it (mine) It was not a universal freebie.

    Mine didn't do it either, although next door's did. But already stated, the times were not very amenable.

    BLT, how do you know that all older people have 'weak bladders'?
    [FONT=Times New Roman, serif]Æ[/FONT]r ic wisdom funde, [FONT=Times New Roman, serif]æ[/FONT]r wear[FONT=Times New Roman, serif]ð[/FONT] ic eald.
    Before I found wisdom, I became old.
  • Kate78
    Kate78 Posts: 525 Forumite
    BLT wrote: »
    It matters if you have paid to get in with your children and are crammed in a pool with 60 old aged pensioners with weak bladders filling up the pool.

    Oh be off with you, it's more likely to be your kids piddling in the pool! :p
    Barclaycard 0% - [STRIKE]£1688.37 [/STRIKE] Paid off 10.06.12
  • tanith
    tanith Posts: 8,091 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture Combo Breaker
    BLT wrote: »
    It matters if you have paid to get in with your children and are crammed in a pool with 60 old aged pensioners with weak bladders filling up the pool.

    Still trying to work out why being over 60 gets you a free ride when the pension retirement age is 65.

    Your post is ill-informed and insulting to the majority of pensioners.. as has been said your children are swimming for free anyway, womens pension retirement age is a little over 60 at this present time ,65 for men and I don't think the majority of over 60's have a weak bladder and if you saw the energetic swimming some of the pensioners I swim with you'd be most surprised... they do a hell of lot better than a lot of people..
    Free swimming has encouraged lots to excercise more and so keep them healthier so saving the NHS money on physio etc... I hope you remember this post when you are 60 and then you might realise how insulting you were...

    Margaretclare we have free swimming anytime of the day here I don't understand why they need to restrict the times?
    #6 of the SKI-ers Club :j

    "All that is necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing" Edmund Burke
  • zygurat789
    zygurat789 Posts: 4,263 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture Combo Breaker
    The central government was funding the scheme by paying lump sums to the local councils, if they allowed free swimming. Some didn't take up the offer because they reasoned they would lose revenue from people who already paid getting in free. I think this subsidy was due to stop in the not to distant future.
    So the government make a saving which they can shout about but it is a one-off saving and no good for future years. Such is politics.
    The local councils will probably get a little more revenue since a survey suggested 83% of scheme beneficiaries would have paid anyway.
    The only thing that is constant is change.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 350.9K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.5K Spending & Discounts
  • 243.9K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 598.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.9K Life & Family
  • 257.2K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.