We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Some TV Interviewers

Options
It makes me mad when in my opinion the interviewer keeps interrupting the interviewee and not allowing them to finish what they are saying just so they make a name for themselves.

An example of this was this morning on GM TV, Nick Clegg was being asked about the potential changes in Child Tax Credits and the female interviewer just wouldn't really allow him to even get half way through an answer before jumping in with another question or repeating the word abolish tax credits, when he clearly said abolishing is not on the cards.

Anne Robinson does the same on Watchdog, like l say to me its just so they can make a name for themselves, I'm sure they don't even listen to what the interviewee is actually saying
«1

Comments

  • sickparrot
    sickparrot Posts: 816 Forumite
    In the case of politicians the interviewers have just got wise to them trotting out the rehearsed party line and not listening to the questions or answering them anyway. I don't know why they even bother quite frankly.
    Out on blue six..
    It's Chips and Jackets, Peas and Trousers.
  • Bowling_4_Gold
    Bowling_4_Gold Posts: 1,771 Forumite
    The program would last for ages if every interview was allowed to run over, so I see no issues in cutting them short.
    The quickest way to become a millionaire is start off as a billionaire and go into the airline business.
    Richard Branson
  • Reggie_Rebel
    Reggie_Rebel Posts: 5,036 Forumite
    It makes me mad when in my opinion the interviewer keeps interrupting the interviewee and not allowing them to finish what they are saying just so they make a name for themselves.

    An example of this was this morning on GM TV, Nick Clegg was being asked about the potential changes in Child Tax Credits and the female interviewer just wouldn't really allow him to even get half way through an answer before jumping in with another question or repeating the word abolish tax credits, when he clearly said abolishing is not on the cards.

    Anne Robinson does the same on Watchdog, like l say to me its just so they can make a name for themselves, I'm sure they don't even listen to what the interviewee is actually saying

    There's the reasons in bold, they just can't help themselves
    It's taken me years of experience to get this cynical
  • ivylinn
    ivylinn Posts: 247 Forumite
    An example of this was this morning on GM TV, Nick Clegg was being asked about the potential changes in Child Tax Credits and the female interviewer just wouldn't really allow him to even get half way through an answer before jumping in with another question or repeating the word abolish tax credits, when he clearly said abolishing is not on the cards.
    It wasn't another question it was pretty much the same question over and over again.
    I found it very frustrating to watch.
  • moonrakerz
    moonrakerz Posts: 8,650 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    The trouble is with these so-called "interviews" is that the interviewer is given a 3 minute slot and 10 questions to ask - they have "targets" to meet.

    The interviewee never actually answers the question but just trots out a statement (here's one I prepared earlier !). The "answer", is of course as long and waffling as it can be made - because then the interviewer will run out of time and not be able to ask the one question which the interviewee may not have prepared for !
    Or, if they really are stumped: "The question you should be asking me is......." is always a good fallback "answer".......

    So the interviewer really hasn't got much option other than to butt in and try the next question.

    It really is just a game !
  • Baggieboy_2
    Baggieboy_2 Posts: 149 Forumite
    Newshound!
    More to do with some people's attention span. I firmly believe these interviews are rushed because producers believe - rightly or wrongly - that viewers cannot concentrate on a single issue for more than 5 minutes. When was the last time that any interviewee on national or local news programmes was allowed to expand their arguments beyond around 15 seconds before the next question is rushed in?
  • Sandoval
    Sandoval Posts: 903 Forumite
    Did you threaten to overrule him?
    Did you threaten to overrule him?
    Did you threaten to overrule him?
    Did you threaten to overrule him?
    Did you threaten to overrule him?
    Did you threaten to overrule him?
    Did you threaten to overrule him?
    Did you threaten to overrule him?

    PAXO ROCKS!! :D

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uwlsd8RAoqI
  • libra10
    libra10 Posts: 19,568 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Having watched the interview this morning I totally agree.

    I think the person doing the interview was Emma Crosby, and agree that she rushed Nick Clegg, not allowing him to answer, speaking over him all the time. Just reiterating the same point time and time again.

    Politicians are devious devils, but she was etrememly rude and didn't give him a chance!
  • lincroft1710
    lincroft1710 Posts: 18,871 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    I get annoyed when interviewers ask questions where the answer is blatantly obvious :

    "Were you very upset when the lion swallowed your 5 year old son?"

    "Are you happy now your 5 year old son has been found safe and well".
    If you are querying your Council Tax band would you please state whether you are in England, Scotland or Wales
  • vyle
    vyle Posts: 2,379 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    I don't know why, these days, they don't just film the interviews a day early, or even before the show goes live, show the key points they need to in their miniscule time slot, then offer the full version for viewing on their website/youtube.

    It's not like the potential of biased editing would be any different to the pointless, biased interruptions.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 350.8K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.5K Spending & Discounts
  • 243.8K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 598.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.8K Life & Family
  • 257.1K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.