We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

how much TV do you think children should watch?

1234579

Comments

  • Morgan_Ree
    Morgan_Ree Posts: 787 Forumite
    ninky wrote: »
    the jury is also slightly out on drinking alcohol during pregnancy but most sensible mums to be still avoid it. there is some evidence that watching tv when young is harmful and there is no evidence that it is beneficial.

    http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/01/090113074419.htm

    “For example, the American Academy of Paediatrics discourages TV viewing in the first two years of life, but only six per cent of parents are aware of this advice despite ongoing publicity.”

    if a serious professional specialist body is suggesting it is best not to allow viewing in the first two years of life is is not a good idea to keep to this advice?

    Well actually it does wonders at keeping my DS amused whilst I have housework/uni work to do :cool:

    I feel sorry for new mums and dads. So much crap thrown at them from 'experts'
    Can't do this, can't do that!
    Their heads must feel like they're about to explode
    Future Mrs Gerard Butler :D

    [STRIKE]
    Team Wagner
    [/STRIKE] I meant Team Matt......obviously :cool:
  • ninky_2
    ninky_2 Posts: 5,872 Forumite
    Morgan_Ree wrote: »
    Well actually it does wonders at keeping my DS amused whilst I have housework/uni work to do :cool:

    I feel sorry for new mums and dads. So much crap thrown at them from 'experts'
    Can't do this, can't do that!
    Their heads must feel like they're about to explode

    if you read the article the 'experts' do acknowledge this practicality but state is should not be encouraged. it's fair enought to say it's a convenient source of 'baby sitting'. but just don't fall into the trap of thinking it is educational when the evidence suggests it can actually delay development and effect concentration span in later childhood. many things that are convenient are not necessarily good in other ways. of course unless legislation is brought in it is up to individuals whether they take the advice of experts or not. personally i think it is great that scientists bother to research such things.
    • 29 per cent of parents who took part in a survey of 1,000 American families published in 2007 said they let their infants watch TV because they thought it was “good for their brains”. But claims made by manufacturers are not substantiated by peer-reviewed medical papers and industry studies.
    • Watching TV programmes or DVDs aimed at infants can actually delay language development, according to a number of studies. For example, a 2008 Thai study published in Acta Paediatrica found that if children under 12 months watched TV for more than two hours a day they were six times more likely to have delayed language skills. Another study found that children who watched baby DVDs between seven and 16 months knew fewer words than children who did not.
    • Infants as young as 14 months will imitate what they see on a TV screen, but they learn better from live presentations. For example, one study found that children learnt Mandarin Chinese better from a native speaker than they did from a video of the same speaker.
    • A study of 1,300 children conducted by the author and colleagues in 2004 found a modest association between TV viewing before the age of three and attentional problems at the age of seven, after a wide range of other factors were ruled out.
    • In another study, the author and colleagues looked at the effects of early TV viewing on cognitive development at school age. They found that children who had watched a lot of TV in their early years did not perform as well when they underwent tests to check their reading and memory skills.
    • More than one in five parents who took part in another study said that they got their infants to watch TV when they needed time to themselves. This, says the author, is an understandable and realistic need, but not one that should be actively promoted.
    Those who will not reason, are bigots, those who cannot, are fools, and those who dare not, are slaves. - Lord Byron
  • Morgan_Ree
    Morgan_Ree Posts: 787 Forumite
    edited 16 June 2010 at 10:39AM
    ninky wrote: »
    if you read the article the 'experts' do acknowledge this practicality but state is should not be encouraged. it's fair enought to say it's a convenient source of 'baby sitting'. but just don't fall into the trap of thinking it is educational when the evidence suggests it can actually delay development and effect concentration span in later childhood.

    Of course it's not educational, it's entertainment.
    I'm forever hearing DS giggling away at whatever Horrid Henry has just done.

    Like I said before, so much crap from 'experts'
    It's all too much! In a few years I expect a manual 'How To Bring Up Your Child' delivered with every baby.

    I'll take my chances and let DS watch his cartoons in peace
    Future Mrs Gerard Butler :D

    [STRIKE]
    Team Wagner
    [/STRIKE] I meant Team Matt......obviously :cool:
  • bylromarha
    bylromarha Posts: 10,085 Forumite
    I've been Money Tipped!
    Morgan_Ree wrote: »
    It's all too much! In a few years I expect a manual 'How To Bring Up Your Child' delivered with every baby.

    Ah, you obviously didn't receive your copy of "birth to 5" :D
    Who made hogs and dogs and frogs?
  • bestpud
    bestpud Posts: 11,048 Forumite
    ninky wrote: »
    the jury is also slightly out on drinking alcohol during pregnancy but most sensible mums to be still avoid it. there is some evidence that watching tv when young is harmful and there is no evidence that it is beneficial.

    http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/01/090113074419.htm

    “For example, the American Academy of Paediatrics discourages TV viewing in the first two years of life, but only six per cent of parents are aware of this advice despite ongoing publicity.”

    if a serious professional specialist body is suggesting it is best not to allow viewing in the first two years of life is is not a good idea to keep to this advice?

    I think it's all about moderation tbh.

    Alcohol is discouraged and yet many still drink 'sensibly' when pregnant and go on to have healthy babies.

    TV is discouraged by this organisation but many well balanced children watch TV.

    I see no reason to ban either of these so long as a bit of common sense is used.

    After all, children will be faced with many tough decisions and one of our jobs is to help them assess risk and make balanced choices in life. I don't want my children to think they must completely avoid anything that may cause them 'harm' - that would be the end of their 'life' as far as I am concerned!
  • peachyprice
    peachyprice Posts: 22,346 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    ninky wrote: »
    .
    • A study of 1,300 children conducted by the author and colleagues in 2004 found a modest association between TV viewing before the age of three and attentional problems at the age of seven, after a wide range of other factors were ruled out.


    Hardly conclusive is it, they haven't even put a figure to this 'modest' number of children, so I would hazard a guess that it's a very small percentage.

    There will always be 'scientists' who are happy to receive grants for 'research' so they don't have to get a real job.

    You only have to read the news this week, apparently your windscreen cleaning bottle carrys a risk of legionaires disease and showers carry lethal bacterias. However have we managed to stay alive so long.

    Research any aspect of life and there will be someone that will find something bad about it, purely because they are looking for it.
    Accept your past without regret, handle your present with confidence and face your future without fear
  • ninky_2
    ninky_2 Posts: 5,872 Forumite
    hey look, you can stick your kids in front of the telly for as long as you like as far as i'm concerned.
    Those who will not reason, are bigots, those who cannot, are fools, and those who dare not, are slaves. - Lord Byron
  • Morgan_Ree
    Morgan_Ree Posts: 787 Forumite
    edited 16 June 2010 at 2:29PM
    bylromarha wrote: »
    Ah, you obviously didn't receive your copy of "birth to 5" :D

    Oh god I forgot about that!

    I must confess I've lost my copy. DS is only 4. God knows how I'm going to get him to 5 without the help of that.
    I'll have to ebay it. I fancy seeing the updated version

    Changing a nappy

    Step 1 - open nappy - remember to wear gloves/facemask/goggles because you might catch ebola/mad cow disease/dysentery/a cold

    Step 2 - clean with a towel because baby wipes will cause your childs ears to fall off.

    Step 3 - once clean incinerate offending nappy in the garden.
    Do not let child witness Step 3. If they do they will grow up to be an arsonist

    Repeat as necessary
    Future Mrs Gerard Butler :D

    [STRIKE]
    Team Wagner
    [/STRIKE] I meant Team Matt......obviously :cool:
  • bestpud
    bestpud Posts: 11,048 Forumite
    ninky wrote: »
    hey look, you can stick your kids in front of the telly for as long as you like as far as i'm concerned.

    Why are you having a strop?
  • thatgirlsam
    thatgirlsam Posts: 10,451 Forumite
    my kids don't watch that much tbh.. they could be watching it now if they wanted, but ds is riding his bike in the garden and dd is playing upstairs.. goodness know what her game is , she just shouted at the top of her voice ' I'LL HAVE YOU KNOW.. I'M A VERY ELEGANT FOWL'

    i have never really limited it, years ago when i was a childminder i had 2 boys that were never allowed to watch and they were totally obsessed with it

    i did use it as a babysitter when they were tiny, when i was cooking for eg.. probably would hold their attention for 30mins or so

    everything in moderation is fine in my opinion
    £608.98
    £80
    £1288.99
    £85.90
    £154.98
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.4K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 601.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.6K Life & Family
  • 259.2K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.