Help required please

Procrastinator333

crackerberry wrote: »

Agency A put the OP forward for one position. Agency B put the OP forward for a different position altogether. Had both put the OP forward for the same position then fine, but that wasn't the case here.

This is all a bit mute point as it comes down to what is in the contract between Employer and agency A.

But I would be very surprised if the contract didn't state for any position.

Otherwise why not reject the applicant, change the job title, give job, pay no fee.


I'm not saying I agree or disagree with this, but if that is in the contract, the employer signed it, tough.

1984ReturnsForReal_2

crackerberry wrote: »

Agency A put the OP forward for one position. Agency B put the OP forward for a different position altogether. Had both put the OP forward for the same position then fine, but that wasn't the case here.

Sorry, crackerberry.

Your point is irrelevant.

All that matters is the contract between agency & employer.

I can tell you now, as a fact, that if terms had been agreed the employer would of agreed to pay a fee if the candidate is employed in any capacity or via a 3rd party.


It is a business deal. It has nothing to do with the candidate & the employer is only trying to back out of paying money or doesn't think the candidate is worth it.


Business is business & it will all be there in black & white. Unless the agency have rubbish terms or didn't get agreement on them.