Good News

jacklink

im so pleased you now get what your entitled to and after all in your words youve been the ''I have been the sole contributor to the household for years'' there fore you've received no benefits what so ever. well done for surviving all those years without benefits. you must have a good job that pays well, therefore the csa payments will be a welcoming addition for you.

congrats

PlayingHardball

jacklink wrote: »

im so pleased you now get what your entitled to and after all in your words youve been the ''I have been the sole contributor to the household for years'' there fore you've received no benefits what so ever. well done for surviving all those years without benefits. you must have a good job that pays well, therefore the csa payments will be a welcoming addition for you.

congrats

Jacklink - you are out to prove a point, no doubt! (as normal)

In circumstances when a single PWC has to rely on income support/financial assistance in order to help them to feed and clothe a small child, our respect does lay with the person (in this case the OP) who chooses to stand by, support their child on their own to the best of their ability... without the financial help of the other 'responsible' parent.

Total respect to the OP here. Total disrespect for the NRP who chose not to support the child.

And your point was?

Loopy_Girl

PHB...thank you very much for your kind words but honestly, just ignore that muppet above you.;)

I don't rate her as a person and certainly not as a Mother (this is a person who denied she had kids) and her silly load of drivel doesn't interest me.

Seriously, don't waste head space or even your words on her.

Blonde_Bint

Well done Loops

Your little un deserves this, and you do too. :T

s'up with jacklinks congrats or am i missing some sarcasm lol, seemed all right to me:o and it wouldnt be the first time I missed a point entirely:rotfl:

kelloggs36

I can't see the problem with Jacklink's post either???

Loopy_Girl

kelloggs36 wrote: »

I can't see the problem with Jacklink's post either???

It's so obviously dripping in sarcasm and doesn't warrant an answer....when have you ever known her to be pleasant to any PWC?;)

PlayingHardball

Maybe I misunderstood, but Loopy made no mention of benefits in her OP, but Jaclink did. I read it as a negative twist on Loopys success. Possible I'm wrong

Debicj

I'm glad you got a result at last. Just goes to show - never give up! :j

kelloggs36

Loopy_Girl wrote: »

It's so obviously dripping in sarcasm and doesn't warrant an answer....when have you ever known her to be pleasant to any PWC?;)

Well I did wonder - as it would be the first pleasant post made, but I just took it on face value!:D

Loopy_Girl

PlayingHardball wrote: »

Maybe I misunderstood, but Loopy made no mention of benefits in her OP, but Jaclink did. I read it as a negative twist on Loopys success. Possible I'm wrong

You're not - you're spot on;)

However, we won't let her spoil this thread (as she has many many others) so we'll say no more on the subject...but apprec thanks again to you