We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Consumer rights on Ebay?

Hi
3 weeks ago I bought a puppy playpen for £40 on ebay. The seller is a shop and sells lots of these. However it is extremely hard to put up and keeps falling down (it's one of those foldable ones).
I persisted with it hoping that it would improve but it's just horrible. I finally emailed the seller last night telling them that I would like a full or partial refund as it is faulty.The seller responded saying they could not give me a full refund as I have had it for 3 weeks,(even though they day I bought it I informed the seller there was a fault) but they offered me a £9 partial refund.
I just don't think this is enough for something that doesn't work, it keeps falling down and my pup can climb out. Can I respond asking for a full refund as it has been less than 4 weeks? and if so, can I claim back the shipping costs of returning it?
Thanks!

Comments

  • KeithP
    KeithP Posts: 41,296 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    You may find this OFT leaflet about Distance Selling Regulations useful.

    You may also need to refer to the Sale of Goods Act.
  • The_Pedant
    The_Pedant Posts: 634 Forumite
    What was the response to that initial email stating there was a fault?

    You are outside of the time period allowed under the DSR. Therefore, in my mind, it comes down to the Sale of Goods act and whether or not you are deemed to have accepted the goods.

    As you did raise 'a fault' initially. The question is how this was followed up? Did the seller reply? Did you have any suggested resolution or other instructions from the seller. The fact it may be 'hard to put up' should only be an issue if it clear does not appear to go together correctly is the instructions are followed. Provided it is able to be assembled correctly then the key question is does it then stand up and perform the job for which it was intended (taking into account cost etc)?

    If you are saying the goods are not fit for purpose intended or of suitable quality, then in light of the original email highlighting the issue then I would say you may well still have good grounds to pursue a claim for a refund refund under the provisions of the Sale of Goods Act. After all, a 'puppy playpen' that does not stay up is hardly able to perform its intended role.
  • pinkshoes
    pinkshoes Posts: 20,656 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    As you bought it on ebay, you can open up an "item not as described" dispute, and tell them that the item is faulty, and that the seller, despite being a business, is refusing to refund.

    You will have to return it tracked at your own expense.
    Should've = Should HAVE (not 'of')
    Would've = Would HAVE (not 'of')

    No, I am not perfect, but yes I do judge people on their use of basic English language. If you didn't know the above, then learn it! (If English is your second language, then you are forgiven!)
  • cyberbob
    cyberbob Posts: 9,480 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Open a dispute now you only have 45 days from sale to do this. You will have to return it tracked at your expense but paypal will refund your full original cost.
  • AndyAndyAndy
    AndyAndyAndy Posts: 118 Forumite
    pinkshoes wrote: »
    You will have to return it tracked at your own expense.

    WRONG, you may initially have to pay this cost yes but you can then claim it back from the retailer as it is due to a fault.

    If they refuse then there is a template letter to get it out of them here 6 posts down by "gyzmo" it is their legal duty to cover reasonable costs associated with returning the product although it may be worthwhile ensuring they are aware of this beforehand to make it easier for you.

    Don't be scared of them or scared of taking it all the way to the court. They'll most likely want to avoid going to court as they know they'd lose and incur court fees.
  • cyberbob
    cyberbob Posts: 9,480 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    AndyDent93 wrote: »
    WRONG, you may initially have to pay this cost yes but you can then claim it back from the retailer as it is due to a fault. .

    Technically yes but how do you enforce this? Paypal only refund your original payment they cannot refund money that hasn't been paid. So if the seller is unwilling the chances of getting return postage back are zero. Unless you want to take them to court which would be silly
  • cyberbob
    cyberbob Posts: 9,480 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    AndyDent93 wrote: »
    Don't be scared of them or scared of taking it all the way to the court. They'll most likely want to avoid going to court as they know they'd lose and incur court fees.

    Your being silly in small claims court fees are not awarded. Without an independent assessment on the item (which would cost) you could not prove that the problem with the item was the seller or manufacturer problem. It would be quite ridiculous to take them to court and you would not guarantee winning
  • AndyAndyAndy
    AndyAndyAndy Posts: 118 Forumite
    At small claims you pay £30 for the privilege but if you win it's refunded, I thought that came from the other side as they had lost?? maybe not but the point wasn't that she should take paypal to court, I agree that is foolish. But why deal with paypal if you could get a better deal from the seller? If he is "a shop" as the OP states then he is bound by the same laws as every other UK based shop on the internet. I realise that paypal is used by ebay and has a seperate system for claiming money back but you have a valid case to recieve a full refund from the seller including any cost of postage back to them.

    I wouldn't even suggest that she should take the seller to small claims court but the threat of the action should be enough to convince the seller that they need to refund you. If the goods are inherently not fit for their intended purpose then you're protected by the Sale of Goods act.

    Slate away if you don't agree with the course of action but you can't deny it is legitimate.
  • toffe
    toffe Posts: 431 Forumite
    cyberbob wrote: »
    Your being silly in small claims court fees are not awarded. Without an independent assessment on the item (which would cost) you could not prove that the problem with the item was the seller or manufacturer problem. It would be quite ridiculous to take them to court and you would not guarantee winning

    actually bob, if you issue a claim via the small claims court the court fees are automatically added to the amount being claimed.

    Best not to call people names unless you know what your talking about, thats not a dig at you, but you called this guy silly and he was right and you were wrong, now you look double silly.

    Drop the name calling.
    ......"A wise man once told me don't argue with fools because people from a distance can't tell who is who"........
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 353.6K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.1K Spending & Discounts
  • 246.7K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 603K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.1K Life & Family
  • 260.7K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.