PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

If an EA is incompetent is the tie in still legal binding?

My estate agent has generaly provided a very poor service that has led me to believe they are incompetent. This week they confirmed it, after 6 weeks of marketing they finaly managed to find someone interested in viewing the property and arranged with the viewer a viewing time on Sunday, however they did not let us know they had arranged a viewing?!
So my one and only viewer so far turned up to view my house when I wasn't in.
Where as all estate agents will vary in terms of level of service, the basic requirement for an estate agent is the ability to arrange a viewing between the potential buyer and vendor. If they fail to do this is it a breach of contract and do you have to pay any heed to the tie in?

In my particular case there is no signed contract, as the EA hasnt realised I never sent it back to them.

Comments

  • princessamy86
    princessamy86 Posts: 4,889 Forumite
    If they don't have a signed contract then I wouldn't have thought they had a leg to stand on, certainly not with regards to a tie in period. I would just send them a letter informing them you are taking the property off the market, it's not like you need to worry about getting stung for fees as they haven't introduced anyone.
    Scar tissue that I wish you saw, sarcastic mister know it all, close your eyes and I'll kiss you cause with the birds I'll share this lonely view.
  • GDB2222
    GDB2222 Posts: 26,364 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    maya+2 wrote: »
    In my particular case there is no signed contract, as the EA hasnt realised I never sent it back to them.

    In common law, you can enter into a contract just by your actions - eg at the supermarket checkout. You received the EA's terms and conditions, you didn't quibble, so you have accepted their terms. There's no question about it.

    The Estate Agency Act 1979 has a number of requirements for EAs to follow, and if they are as incompetent as you suggest they may have slipped up. Have a look here:
    http://www.oft.gov.uk/shared_oft/business_leaflets/general/oft031.pdf
    No reliance should be placed on the above! Absolutely none, do you hear?
  • Evilm
    Evilm Posts: 1,950 Forumite
    The contract may not have been sent back to them but as said above actions can show acceptance of the contract.

    Some of the contracts have a notification clause that you can give them say two weeks notice to end the exclusive period even during the tie in - read it carefully and check.

    If you can't get out of it then have a frank conversation with the Estate Agents and tell them you are unhappy and expect more. I did that with ours and they booked us in with the local paper to get the editorial spot on the front page of the houses section.
  • maya+2
    maya+2 Posts: 78 Forumite
    I do agree that the contract can still be viewed as binding despite not being signed.

    However I wonder because they have not provided the promised service, similar to consumer goods law, where goods must be fit for purpose, if I have to take notice of their terms as they have breached the contract by being unable to perform a basic EA task of arranging a viewing between two parties.

    I have other gripes, including an inability to correct errors in the rightmove ad, and when we chase them up to change them they drag their heals or say they don't know how to change them???
    They are also showing the wrong price for the property on their own website, we reduced the price 3 weeks ago and they still are showing the old price, so I don't even know what price they will be telling people.
    So they are marketing my property on their website and I presume in branch at the wrong price, again... basic requirement for an EA.
    I could go on.
  • Evilm
    Evilm Posts: 1,950 Forumite
    maya+2 wrote: »
    I do agree that the contract can still be viewed as binding despite not being signed.

    However I wonder because they have not provided the promised service, similar to consumer goods law, where goods must be fit for purpose, if I have to take notice of their terms as they have breached the contract by being unable to perform a basic EA task of arranging a viewing between two parties.

    I have other gripes, including an inability to correct errors in the rightmove ad, and when we chase them up to change them they drag their heals or say they don't know how to change them???
    They are also showing the wrong price for the property on their own website, we reduced the price 3 weeks ago and they still are showing the old price, so I don't even know what price they will be telling people.
    So they are marketing my property on their website and I presume in branch at the wrong price, again... basic requirement for an EA.
    I could go on.

    Then this is a different issue. It can be hard to prove that someone isn't marketing the property correctly because having no viewings doesn't always mean much.

    However not correcting the listings for the correct details is an indication they are not doing their job properly and might be suitable to claim as not performing their part of the contract correctly.

    Regarding not contacting you to ok the viewing that could just be considered a honest mistake since it has only happened the once.

    I would speak to them and note you are very unhappy and consider they are not honouring their part of the contract and therefore you will go elsewhere. See how they react and take your actions from there.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.6K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.9K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.6K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.2K Life & Family
  • 258.2K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.