Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Deflation Watch pt 152

1568101114

Comments

  • michaels
    michaels Posts: 29,133 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    I saw that chart and had to admit I didn't really like it because the rather arbitarily chosen 2006=100 I felt gave a misleading view of wether consumption was below where 'it should be'.

    Re the bank deposit figures quoted later, I don't think the risk/return is the only factor draiving this, the changed regularory environmrnt requiring banks to very quickly change their asset profile means such extreme moves at the margin are required. Also all the reporting means that consumer and business sentiment is very negative thus making it hard for banks to actually lend money even if they want to - there are very competitve deals for credit card and mortgage debt available at the moment but most consumers are concentrating on paying down debt...
    Generali wrote: »
    A graph which isn't looking very promising for the economy.


    _57237447_ir11nov2web2.jpg

    Consumption has collapsed vs wages. It's what needs to happen in the end but it'll be painful for a while as people pay down debt.
    I think....
  • tomterm8
    tomterm8 Posts: 5,892 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture Combo Breaker
    Nice to see an old favourite thread up. The irony is, more than a year later and we still seem to be in exactly the same position. If anything, it appears things are going to get worse next year compared to this year.
    “The ideas of debtor and creditor as to what constitutes a good time never coincide.”
    ― P.G. Wodehouse, Love Among the Chickens
  • Generali
    Generali Posts: 36,411 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    The money supply fell £28,800,000,000 in December, a month-on-month fall of 1.4% (seasonally adjusted) which is a year on year fall of 2.5%.

    Expect another round of QE very soon.
  • Road_Hog
    Road_Hog Posts: 2,749 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Generali wrote: »
    Expect another round of QE very soon.

    Whenever I read QE, I think of this Question Time animation, especially the bit at the end with Gordon Brown.

    Warning, contains naughty words for those easily offended and of a sensitive disposition.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RYA0DsPcbaU
  • Generali
    Generali Posts: 36,411 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    BTW, I forgot to add to my previous post, the money supply using the broadest definition (M4) fell by £51,000,000,000 in 2011. This is despite an additional £75,000,000,000 of QE in 2011.
  • Generali
    Generali Posts: 36,411 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    edited 31 March 2012 at 5:43AM
    It's the time of the month again when the BoE releases M4 numbers for February.

    M4 fell £39,500,000,000 in Feb, or 1.9%. That's a 3.4% fall on the year.

    More QE will be the result IMHO.

    ETA: I was right about the last lot of QE BTW!
  • michaels
    michaels Posts: 29,133 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    So are the BoE targetting nominal gdp now?
    I think....
  • Generali
    Generali Posts: 36,411 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    michaels wrote: »
    So are the BoE targetting nominal gdp now?

    Not officially AFAIK. There was an interesting piece on FT Alphaville about how the Chancellor can change the definition of price stability at will this week though.

    It's interesting (to me) how M4 is falling in the face of inflation. In real terms it's down over 7% YoY! Over the past decade M4 was rising at 5-10%pa IIRC.
  • sabretoothtigger
    sabretoothtigger Posts: 10,036 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Combo Breaker
    edited 8 April 2012 at 4:49PM
    Cash as a physical is a declining prospect. I think this is why mastercard or visa as an investment is a clever thing, the velocity of money is increasing ?

    M4. I guess this matches prices doubling since 1990
    United Kingdom


    M4 money supply of the United Kingdom 1984–2007. In thousand millions (billions) of pounds sterling.
    There are just two official UK measures. M0 is referred to as the "wide monetary base" or "narrow money" and M4 is referred to as "broad money" or simply "the money supply".
    M0: Cash outside Bank of England + Banks' operational deposits with Bank of England. (No longer published.)
    M4: Cash outside banks (i.e. in circulation with the public and non-bank firms) + private-sector retail bank and building society deposits + Private-sector wholesale bank and building society deposits and Certificate of Deposit.[27]
    There are several different definitions of money supply to reflect the differing stores of money. Due to the nature of bank deposits, especially time-restricted savings account deposits, the M4 represents the most illiquid measure of money. M0, by contrast, is the most liquid measure of the money supply


    V7Yxa.png


    Deflation in gold very possible. Pity then USA shut down Nasa missions, this was their best bet (they did land 'Shoemaker' on it)

    988wK.jpg

    actually thousand billion or 1 trillion is peanuts nowadays which maybe illustrates how low the gold price is relatively ?
    Eros is 200,000x more gold then has ever been mined on earth

    3YlRR.gif

    My point is anything at all is possible but I do not think deflation in total is probable
  • Masomnia
    Masomnia Posts: 19,506 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Generali wrote: »
    That says it all really. These banks feel this money is better serving them making €5,000,000,000 a year in interest on deposit rather than €100,000,000,000 (less defaults) in interest being used for credit card lending.

    Time for negative deposit rates?
    “I could see that, if not actually disgruntled, he was far from being gruntled.” - P.G. Wodehouse
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.7K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.1K Life & Family
  • 257.7K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.